WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Remember from history class how the normans took over and became the new nobility for the anglo-saxons?

This is that.

Because we have neofeudalism fused at the hip with kritarchy disguised as an oligarchy disguised as a kakistocracy disguised as a democracy, wearing the corpse of a republic as a mask on its face. And it employs a mix of neo-bolshevist, new age religion, disguised stalinist murders, fascism (the fusion of the state and corporations), and corporate socialism.

And central banks are simultenously its kings, its popes, and its gods. They are the inner party.

Welcome to the second-to-final-form of communism, which is just less and less subtle forms of slavery and murder.

All as we exist in the twilight of civilization, and the shadow of totalitarianism's final dictator: The antichrist.

[–] 1 pt

totalitarianism's final dictator: The antichrist.

The Anti-Christ is not an individual. The Anti-Christ were the people who, when the Abrahamic religion split, rejected Jesus as the Messiah. They were the Against-Jesus people; the Anti-Christ. The Anti-Christ are the people who rejected Christ. The Anti-Christ are the Jews.

The Bible is VERY clear on that.

[–] 0 pt

The Anti-Christ are the people who rejected Christ. The Anti-Christ are the Jews.

I'm speaking of a figure-head who simultenously provokes the creation, and embodies the social, political, and economic force of a particular kind of zeitgeist.

Big-A, Antichrist.

you're talking about the little-a antichrists.

I look at revelations as a psychohistory 'tactical manual'. So if it could happen before, it'll probably happen again.

[–] 0 pt

I'm speaking of a figure-head who simultenously provokes the creation, and embodies the social, political, and economic force of a particular kind of zeitgeist.

What will it take for you to realise that the provoking of the creation, and embodiment of the social, political, and economic force of a particular kind of zeitgeist is not being done by one person, but by a group of people?

And at what point will you be willing to accept that the group of people are the Jews?