Yeah sure, it's up to me to prove that an armed insurrection is possible in the US... And that it's going to lead to any positive or even desirable result.... I'm not the one claiming that it's a realistic option, sorry. Needless to mention that you failed to provide an example of successful armed insurrection/popular uprising. What I see is a country balkanized/factionned beyond repair. It's not a good start for a collective action... To say the least. What I see is a bunch of isolated individualist, sitting at home near their guns, waiting for .gov to come and take them, while .gov regularly entertain the idea, which makes weapon sales go through the roof, and then it's a nothing burger, as usual. And it keeps circling like that since decades. And it's not going to change, it's just the same circus. Ashli Babbit got executed right in the middle of the capitol, guess what will happen? Nothing serious, obviously. And those, are facts, not "unproven assertion" There won't be an armed insurrection in the US against the uniparty. Ever. At best you'll get people shooting at each others over random shits baltimore style on a bigger scale, and that's all that's going to happen with guns. The Nation is gone https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation >>A nation is a community of people formed on the basis of a common language, history, ethnicity, or a common culture, and, in many cases, a shared territory. A nation is more overtly political than an ethnic group;[1][2] it has been described as "a fully mobilized or institutionalized ethnic group".[3] Some nations are equated with ethnic groups (see ethnic nationalism and nation state) and some are equated with an affiliation with a social and political constitution (see civic nationalism and multiculturalism).[3] A nation has also been defined as a cultural-political community that has become conscious of its autonomy, unity and particular interests.[4] In international law nation is the term for a sovereign state[citation needed].