As if "action" as in a physical attack would bring any meaningful results to begin with, let alone a positive one
That’s a big assertion. Why wouldn’t it? Prove it.
And no, all americans or even a quarter of them aren't suddenly going to unite and move as one man to storm the white house and congress... And what? What then? Burn it all down with everything inside? Then what? What is it supposed to achieve? A massive stress relief aside for some?
Yeah that many people would probably never do that made up scenario you just used as an outrageous example. What’s your point?
Everything under the sun is put forward to infuriate the masses as far as I can tell. If a violent insurrection is what they are trying to achieve, they've really been trying hard to bring about just that. Violence isn't a terain unfamiliar to the so called DS, to say the least. As a matter of fact, they are experts when it comes to it.
A bunch of goat fuckers in Afghanistan have been putting up a great fight against these “experts” for the past 20 years. As we speak these “experts” are being replaced by Marxist losers and sympathizers of questionable ability.
>That’s a big assertion. Why wouldn’t it? Prove it.
Show me one example of violent action NOT SUPPORTED BY TPTB over the past decades (plenty of examples) that didn't result in a reinforcement of the system (excuse for crackdowns) or simply nothing at all if not the contrary of the desired effect.
There are none.
Even if you go back to the war of independance there were huge backings from state powers going on behind the scene just to spite the british empire
>A bunch of goat fuckers in Afghanistan have been putting up a great fight against these “experts” for the past 20 years. As we speak these “experts” are being replaced by Marxist losers and sympathizers of questionable ability.
You really think this wasn't the entire point from the beginning? Hello?
The entire point was to bankrupt the US since day1/911
Meanwhile, bankers and the "global MIC" (because it's not just a US domestic beast at this point) made a literal killing, at the expense of the US tax payers/citizens evidently
The whole point.
>Yeah that many people would probably never do that made up scenario you just used as an outrageous example. What’s your point?
What's the alternative scenario then? Everybody shelter in place and wait?
Prove it, just saying it never happened before isn’t proof.
Why do you assume there won’t be any backing? Do you know what the future holds? I don’t think so.
You’re piling on more unproven assertions and variables to your argument without addressing the previous ones. This is a waste of my time.
Yeah sure, it's up to me to prove that an armed insurrection is possible in the US... And that it's going to lead to any positive or even desirable result....
I'm not the one claiming that it's a realistic option, sorry. Needless to mention that you failed to provide an example of successful armed insurrection/popular uprising.
What I see is a country balkanized/factionned beyond repair. It's not a good start for a collective action... To say the least.
What I see is a bunch of isolated individualist, sitting at home near their guns, waiting for .gov to come and take them, while .gov regularly entertain the idea, which makes weapon sales go through the roof, and then it's a nothing burger, as usual. And it keeps circling like that since decades. And it's not going to change, it's just the same circus.
Ashli Babbit got executed right in the middle of the capitol, guess what will happen? Nothing serious, obviously.
And those, are facts, not "unproven assertion"
There won't be an armed insurrection in the US against the uniparty. Ever. At best you'll get people shooting at each others over random shits baltimore style on a bigger scale, and that's all that's going to happen with guns.
The Nation is gone
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation
>A nation is a community of people formed on the basis of a common language, history, ethnicity, or a common culture, and, in many cases, a shared territory. A nation is more overtly political than an ethnic group;[1][2] it has been described as "a fully mobilized or institutionalized ethnic group".[3] Some nations are equated with ethnic groups (see ethnic nationalism and nation state) and some are equated with an affiliation with a social and political constitution (see civic nationalism and multiculturalism).[3] A nation has also been defined as a cultural-political community that has become conscious of its autonomy, unity and particular interests.[4] In international law nation is the term for a sovereign state[citation needed].
(post is archived)