Rule of thumb: If you see newly introduced language designed to subtly subconsciously frame an issue in a positive or negative light, you're probably dealing with the work of the Jewish Supremacists.

723

•

From the 'Glorious Revolution,' (and the 'Immortal Seven'), to the 'Nazis,' to 'White Supremacy,' to 'Anti-Semitism,' to 'Far Right,' to 'Holocaust/Climate Change Denialist,' to 'Dreamers,' etc. etc.

This linguistic trickery - using control of organs of mass influence to introduce weaponized linguistics into mass consciousness - seems to be a very common tactic of this tribe.

Weaponized language like this, used repeatedly, plants an understanding in the target's subconscious mind, without them being consciously aware of it, and without raising the attention of any 'fact checkers.'

It's one way 'journalists' can deceive and manipulate without being overtly untruthful, and thus retaining the patina of 'reputability.'

There are others, which is worthy of a post of its own.

From the 'Glorious Revolution,' (and the 'Immortal Seven'), to the 'Nazis,' to 'White Supremacy,' to 'Anti-Semitism,' to 'Far Right,' to 'Holocaust/Climate Change Denialist,' to 'Dreamers,' etc. etc. This linguistic trickery - using control of organs of mass influence to introduce weaponized linguistics into mass consciousness - seems to be a very common tactic of this tribe. Weaponized language like this, used repeatedly, plants an understanding in the target's subconscious mind, without them being consciously aware of it, and without raising the attention of any 'fact checkers.' It's one way 'journalists' can deceive and manipulate without being overtly untruthful, and thus retaining the patina of 'reputability.' There are others, which is worthy of a post of its own.

[–] • 3 pts

when the news feels compelled to try to convince you of a fact instead of just simply reporting the story...

link

[–] • 1 pt

Glad to see this brought up. Another variant is when TPTB would rather waste time inventing an acronym than dealing with an issue they supposedly care all too deeply about.

They might even come right out and say its about optics. Their priority is what people think in their daily life. Not solutions. Then they create rules demanding that the whole world adopt their buzzword.

Its a bad joke through and through.

link

[–] • 1 pt

Like "social distancing."

The fucking phrase means nothing but people say it and immediately pretend like theu understand what it means.

Or I like how every nigger now wanta to "have a conversation."

If you bring up something controversial, they say they want to "bring you to the table and have a conversation."

I'm like, what the fuck we're having the conversation right now. You can't just say we're going to have a conversation and then move on. It's a stall tactic so thay they don't actually have to engage in critical discourse.

link

[–] • 1 pt

What are you, some sort of having a conversation denier?

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Almost feels like they are trying to push people away from each other so they can indoctrinate the sheeple.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

like when someone on poal tries to explain to you that when you are 'objecting' to a vaccine youre not objecting to the vaccine youre objecting to something something something something i dont know

link

[–] • 0 pt

I’m not objecting to a vaccine, I’m just asserting my body, my choice preference with my pronouns unvax/normal

parent
link

[+] [deleted] • 1 pt

[–] • 0 pt

Just do your own checking of what is being written, and think for yourself.

link

(post is archived)

You can claim this sub in /s/subrequest