WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

268

Sooooooooo Are they implying that the jews are degenerates that are behind all of the degen gay/trans/furry/etc shit and have been for THOUSANDS OF YEARS? You don't say.....

Archive: https://archive.today/PJpuF

From the post:

>Archaeologists in Israel have found a rare ancient figurine depicting an explicit scene – a goose attempting to mate with a woman. The remarkable clay sculpture, just 1.4-inch (3.7cm) tall, was uncovered from a prehistoric settlement in northern Israel. Scientists believe it is the world's earliest figurine depicting a human-animal interaction. Laurent Davin, an archaeologist at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem who made the finding, called it 'extraordinary on multiple levels'. 'The depicted scene relates to the imaginary mating of a gander spirit with a woman,' he told the Daily Mail.

Sooooooooo Are they implying that the jews are degenerates that are behind all of the degen gay/trans/furry/etc shit and have been for THOUSANDS OF YEARS? You don't say..... Archive: https://archive.today/PJpuF From the post: >>Archaeologists in Israel have found a rare ancient figurine depicting an explicit scene – a goose attempting to mate with a woman. The remarkable clay sculpture, just 1.4-inch (3.7cm) tall, was uncovered from a prehistoric settlement in northern Israel. Scientists believe it is the world's earliest figurine depicting a human-animal interaction. Laurent Davin, an archaeologist at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem who made the finding, called it 'extraordinary on multiple levels'. 'The depicted scene relates to the imaginary mating of a gander spirit with a woman,' he told the Daily Mail.
[–] 3 pts (edited )

Sooooooooo Are they implying that the jews are degenerates that are behind all of the degen gay/trans/furry/etc shit and have been for THOUSANDS OF YEARS?

I got a couple of problems with this statement.

Jews did not exist in Palestine 12,000 years ago, whether you believe the Jews or the Archaeologists, Jews did not exist back then.

Secondly, these retard archaeologists are doing some heavy lifting with their imagination.

This is the image of the artifact:

!

Certainly it could be a swan fucking a woman, it you look at it hard enough and have a swan fetish.

But I can also easily see a crocodile ripping off a human's arm at the shoulder joint. I can also easily see two elephants mating.

Neither would be unrealistic interpretations, give known human and animal ranges of the time.

Regardless, this is the gay furry way the archaeologists chose to depict it.

NSFW

!

Archaeologists attempting to interpret prehistoric art with certitude is the dumbest, most interpretive shit I have ever seen.

[–] 1 pt

I agree entirely on all points. I was partially making a joke but kind of not.

More or less... They claim they have always owned that land (they did not and have not) but then they find some rock and see it as a woman getting "done" by an animal... Soooooo.

[–] 1 pt

Upon further inspection, I actually think this is Jews laughing in our faces, trying to see what they can get the Goyim to believe and report on.

They drew both of her arms like circumcised penises.

!

[–] 1 pt

Another point. Why does "She" appear to have a beard or something?

Oh, Right. Degen jews.

[–] 1 pt

I agree entirely on all points. I was partially making a joke but kind of not.

I know, I wasn't trying to sass ya.

But Archaeology is by far and away the sketchiest of all the 'Soft Sciences", to the point where it maintains almost no true credibility in my book.

It is a science built upon aristocrats from France and England competing against each other, and competing amongst themselves, to bring back the most impressive artifacts from Egypt and the Middle East.

If you look at modern archaeology, it almost exclusively arose after Napoleon's Invasion of Egypt, when gave them control of several artifacts, including the Rosetta Stone. But then the British took control of the Rosetta Stone, )

This kicked off the era of Egyptology amongst the English Aristocrats, where the landed and wealthy classes of Englishmen attempted to show off their wealth by traveling to Egypt or the Middle East in search of more artifacts and discoveries or bring back to their curios.

This is the foundation of Archaeology, at least in the English-speaking world.

Extremely wealthy English Aristocrats attempting to one-up each other with their latest display of artifacts recovered, along with their personal theories about what they mean, and how it happened.

), as were stinking French aristocrats, such as .

Regardless, the Glory of translating and deciphering hieroglyphics from an ancients stone are not often met again.

But people still want glory, no matter what.

I would argue that after that, the Aristocrats, particularly from the British Empire, went on a spree of attempting to dig up old artifacts, to get their own glory.

And most of them were not quite as talented as Thomas Young, and attempted to posit the best story they could come up with, just to bring attention to themselves.

Regardless, early Archaeology/Egyptology is not about science, it is mostly about vainity and statecraft.

And that is the foundation upon with the 'Science' is built.

[–] 0 pt

Perhaps the illustrated edition of Leda and the Swan?