Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

As David Wood always accusing to islamic apologetics, no consistency whatsoever, 'the law for thee but not for me' 👈 this turns out to be true, even muslim syeikh

background story: - this muslim syeikh want to dissent the messenger using accusation because they're not eligible to talk and scrutinize about islam.
- they can't answer clearly 'because of islam'
- in times of lockdown, muslims are tuning more and more to religion and topic around that. Christian apologist and polemicist make use of this time.
- UltraCrepidarianism, in short, people that talk about thing but have no knowledge and authority talk
- topic of quran preservation (which actually is not, is more destructive or equal than satanic verses).

As David Wood always accusing to islamic apologetics, no consistency whatsoever, *'the law for thee but not for me'* 👈 this turns out to be true, even **muslim syeikh** **background story:** - this muslim syeikh want to dissent the messenger using accusation because they're not eligible to talk and scrutinize about islam. - they can't answer clearly 'because of islam' - in times of lockdown, muslims are tuning more and more to religion and topic around that. Christian apologist and polemicist make use of this time. - UltraCrepidarianism, in short, people that talk about thing but have no knowledge and authority talk - topic of quran preservation (which actually is not, is more destructive or equal than satanic verses).

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

Muslim's do this with Taqiyah and what they ascribe to a failure of translation... It seems killing non-believers wasn't mistranslated as they do.