1 - jews are not edomits or *ites, they're pharisees. 2 - jews are from nowhere near the region, not close. 3 - jews' (pharisees) claims to the region are to a small hilltop named zion, nothing more. 4 - jews have literally nothing to do with any tribe in, from, or around the region of Judeah. None.
The bible says they intermixed with the people of Babylon and Canaan. The people of Babylon and Canaanites include the Edomites, Amalekites, and many, many other people. This is how they became Arabs. These people went on to become the Pharisees and Sadducees and other subversive groups (usurping Levi, having abandoned Hebrewism). They are all the same people.
If you have issue with this, you have issue with the bible and historical record, not me.
Edit: with them they brought out of Babylon the Babylonian Tradition of The Elders. Today called Judaism. BToTE is the entire basis for these groups. They are the same peoples. This is why they claim to be the children of Abraham. This is why Jesus said they are not.
Nope. jews weren't from Babylon, sandjews weren't eitehr. jews were from "magog" from "gog and magog" (gog was the demon magog was a land) which was in the NE portion of Asia. The entire Khazar theory of jews being Khazars is false and that also goes for jews being Babylonian.
e;
The bible says they intermixed with the people of Babylon and Canaan.
Oh you don't say? Like they do with Whites, Europe etc? Like they did with Turkey? Italy? Spain? jews are not Canaanites, Edomites and aren't any of the "Tribes of israel Judea". They as the eternal mutts subverted by shape shifting (rape + incest + eternal muttdom) into those groups. They have no state of their own, none. They have no history of their own, they have no creation (in the sense of good, not evil) of their own.
Then you disagree with the bible, genetics, and the historical record.
I'm indifferent on the khazars, which were not part of the discussion.
(post is archived)