I can't believe (I totally can, it's a rhetorical flourish) the Register would allow one of their reporters to write this, even if it is on the opinion pages. We need to get rid of the caucuses because they don't help the democrats? It's almost as unbelievable as the article itself, *instead of listening to voters we need to rig the process more in our favor.* Do these sound like other (((arguments))) you've heard? Also, [Jason Noble](https://files.catbox.moe/r3jalw.jpg). >I’m well aware of the arguments against the caucuses, too: ***Iowa is too white*** to accurately represent the country, and gives outsize influence to unrepresentative factions within both parties. The caucus process is at best convoluted and unwieldy — and at worst undemocratic and *discriminatory*. >Why? Because being first in the nation is bad for Iowa. For the Democratic Party to reach Iowa voters, win Iowa elections, make Iowa policy and improve the lives of Iowans, ***it must give up its privileged place*** on the national nominating calendar.