Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

207

Almost all of the spam I analyze has bad security records - ignoring anything with a bad / no DMARC would stop probably 80% of our spam problems.

The rest is a mix of no SPF/DKIM (I have no idea why that's even being accepted) and internal problems at the sender's computer. You're never going to fix PEBCAC.

Almost all of the spam I analyze has bad security records - ignoring anything with a bad / no DMARC would stop probably 80% of our spam problems. The rest is a mix of no SPF/DKIM (I have no idea why that's even being accepted) and internal problems at the sender's computer. You're never going to fix PEBCAC.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (8).
[–] • 1 pt

You're never going to fix PEBCAC

That's the fucking truth. I had a user today who got a phishing message (not even a good one, just set the FROM to the company name - didn't even bother spoofing anything) last night. Landed in his personal quarantine box. He ignored because it looked funny.

Another came in to his quarantine box this morning. He told me "I figured it wasn't fake if they sent it twice." He then proceeded to open the message, scan a QR code on his phone, go to a fake 365 login page and enter in his network user name and password.

How do fucking retards like that even dress themselves?

[–] • 1 pt

Sounds like someone needs a vtech "My First Laptop" at their desk.

[–] • 1 pt

That would be funny to replace his and pretend like it’s all good now.

[–] • 1 pt

I've threatened it to people here. That, and replace their desk phone with one of those Fisher-Price Chatter Phones.