Users. First self-regulation, then via peers (report button, replies, PMs), then mods (replies, PMs, post deletion, user ban), then finally admins only if all of the previous steps fail.
Next will be those who don't want to see subs they consider racist, then LGBTQWERTY, next Vegan...
Yeah but you can say no to these requests based on lack of merit for them. (If they even occur, which I think is unlikely.)
Creating a blockable porn category would attract less porn because Schlomo has little way of knowing whether it's getting any views. (And if they don't figure it out, we've wasted Schlomo's time and sheckles, which is a noble achievement.)
Yeah but you can say no to these requests based on lack of merit for them. (If they even occur, which I think is unlikely.)
So I can say no to any of these requests but yours?
Creating a blockable porn category would attract less porn because Schlomo
Quite the contrary, This will give them a reason to just post porn as NSFW while playing the "I didn't know" card.
Porn doesn't deserve a special treatment that would attract more spammers.
>So I can say no to any of these requests but yours
I never implied you couldn't make up your own mind on the merit of my suggestion. I'm simply making my case for it here.
This sort of "if I say yes to one thing people will ask for other things" is a poor argument because:
1) people will ask what they're gonna ask anyway
2) you don't have to say yes to one request just because you said yes to another one.
people will ask what they're gonna ask anyway
you don't have to say yes to one request just because you said yes to another one.
Easy thing to say when you don't have to deal with the people who refuse to take a no as an answer (especially if we've previously said yes for a similar request).
(post is archived)