Porn is mainly degeneracy pushed by kikes and is part of the NSFW stuff. There's no reason for it to be classified differently
If it were classified differently from NSFW then users could opt to block porn without blocking non-porn NSFW, such as subs like /s/WTF, /s/Anything, /s/QRP.
As it is now, most people will uncheck the block NSFW box because they want to see that occasional funny/interesting post from /s/WTF on their feed. And the Jew delights in this because they can continue to push porn into users consciousness (even if they'd prefer not to have it). New porn subs are constantly being made, which helps evade block preferences based on individual subs.
Oh, so you blocked /s/Cuckold? Well this week, goy, I'm starting /s/SexyBlackThots. And then I'm making /s/Incest. So even if someone wants to block every porn sub they see, one by one, they're still constantly exposed to porn in their feed because the Jew never tires of creating fresh degeneracy.
All because we wanted to watch a video of someone dying now and then. How is that kosher?
Who gets to decide what porn is and must be tagged as such?
The original poster? I, too, wouldn't mind an ability to differentiate. I have a giant TV that I use as a monitor and it makes life easier to manage if I don't have to worry about the family walking in on random hardcore porn.
Firstly, the posters/sub creators, but ultimately, the admins.
If I post porn without marking it NSFW either you or @PMYB2 are going to ask me to mark it NSFW or do it for me.
If I made a SFW sub for videos of people dying I'm pretty sure either you or @PMYB2 would ask me to make the sub NSFW or do it for me.
(edit: So in the event of unmarked PORN, it would be the same deal.)
The userbase in general can help police this with the report button (which I assume happens anyway in the event NSFW content is not properly tagged).
Fuck off, Puritan.
Oy Vey, Shlomo!
That's all you can say.
(post is archived)