Drop it now during a lot of distractions, make it sound like a nothing burger, move on to the next news cycle.
But why ever bring it up again? Are they going to come clean about who gislaine sold kids to next?
Why bring it up? This is speculation, since we don’t know anything, but I’d say with Biden’s popularity at historic lows, Russia dropping truth bombs about illicit Biden activity, and the fact they’ve had a year to get their story straight on the laptop and the diary, they’re getting ahead of a story they knew wasn’t going to stay buried.
Hunter is the Achilles heel of a Biden presidency fraught with plenty of problems. By pointing people to his drug abuse and kid fucker tendencies, it distracts from the influence peddling.
The same tactic was used when (((Matt Drudge))) just “happened” upon the “spiked” Monica Lewinsky story and pushed it to the masses. Clinton became the cad Chad, while it buried the stories about “renting out” the Lincoln bedroom to Chinese nationalists and the obvious Clinton involvement in the “leaks” at Los Alamos, by having everybody talk about stained blue dresses.
Because they are going to blame his pedophilic pictures on hunter and remove Biden under national security threat.
I will echo another commenter..why bring it up again at all? They had already committed to the “it’s Russian bullshit” narrative. And all of their lemming followers just bought it and moved on.
Not trying to be a dick, but your answer completely ignored the question I was posing…
(post is archived)