Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

301

I’ve heard some theories, but want to see what everyone else thinks..

The one thing I know is that they didn’t just suddenly admit that the laptop is real for no reason..the question in my mind is what is the reason?

I’ve heard some theories, but want to see what everyone else thinks.. The one thing I know is that they didn’t just suddenly admit that the laptop is real for no reason..the question in my mind is what is the reason?

(post is archived)

[–] • 6 pts

Setting the stage to remove Joe Biden.

[–] • 0 pt

I’ve heard that as the most popular theory…but is it even necessary? He wouldn’t have won without the cheating in the first place. All they have to do to “remove him” is simply not cheat in the next election..

If you’re talking about removing him before the next election, then what? Kamala is prez by default and then what?

Why even remove Joe? Why does it matter? He’s just a puppet anyhow..

[–] • 4 pts

Frame the story, minimize it to poor drug addict Hunter who turned his life around and became a successful artist. Indictment coming. The uniparty's playground for money laundering is Ukraine. They got money into and out from Ukraine and from Russia and now it's out of control and they are about to be found out, the backstabbing and playing both sides of the conflict blew up in their faces.

[–] • 0 pt

Ok so I’ll ask again…why admit the laptop is real?

Are you saying “to get out in front of the story”?

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

Frame the story, MINIMIZE IT to poor drug addict Hunter...

Here's Biden accidentally spilling the beans on how they'll make it only about Hunter https://www.shorenewsnetwork.com/2022/03/16/watch-joe-bidens-bizarre-speech-about-naked-pictures-and-blackmail/

[–] • 3 pts

Drop it now during a lot of distractions, make it sound like a nothing burger, move on to the next news cycle.

[–] • 1 pt

But why ever bring it up again? Are they going to come clean about who gislaine sold kids to next?

[–] • 1 pt

Why bring it up? This is speculation, since we don’t know anything, but I’d say with Biden’s popularity at historic lows, Russia dropping truth bombs about illicit Biden activity, and the fact they’ve had a year to get their story straight on the laptop and the diary, they’re getting ahead of a story they knew wasn’t going to stay buried.

Hunter is the Achilles heel of a Biden presidency fraught with plenty of problems. By pointing people to his drug abuse and kid fucker tendencies, it distracts from the influence peddling.

The same tactic was used when (((Matt Drudge))) just “happened” upon the “spiked” Monica Lewinsky story and pushed it to the masses. Clinton became the cad Chad, while it buried the stories about “renting out” the Lincoln bedroom to Chinese nationalists and the obvious Clinton involvement in the “leaks” at Los Alamos, by having everybody talk about stained blue dresses.

[–] • 0 pt

Because they are going to blame his pedophilic pictures on hunter and remove Biden under national security threat.

[–] • 1 pt

I will echo another commenter..why bring it up again at all? They had already committed to the “it’s Russian bullshit” narrative. And all of their lemming followers just bought it and moved on.

Not trying to be a dick, but your answer completely ignored the question I was posing…

[+] [deleted] • 1 pt
[–] • 2 pts

The Big Jews, neocons, and the other fascists in the Deep State, under the command of Klaus Schwab and the globo-fascists in Europe, have decided it is about time to remove Joe Biden from the White House. They sent the word down from on high to the corporate slave media that Biden is now "fair game," as the Scientologists used to put it. He and his nasty son Hunter are no longer off-limits. You will hear Saturday Night Live and the late night talk shows doing Biden jokes soon, if it hasn't happened already. They too have been given the word that it is now permissible to criticize Joe Biden.

[–] • 0 pt

This is what I tend to think. They are getting rid of Biden.

[–] • 2 pts

Theory I heard other than the handlers are ready to take Joe out. Is that NYT isn't going to be able to ignore Hunter's upcoming charges of tax fraud. In order to properly report on that (hard to ignore if DOJ charges him), they have to admit the information on the laptop is real.

[–] • 2 pts

Makes sense and that's the simplest explanation

[–] • 2 pts

Possibly to distract from the inflation?

There's so much shit hitting the fan at the same time at the moment, it's hard to see what is actual shit and what is shit deliberately flung at the fan to distract from the other shit that's hitting the fan so people can't accurately judge how much shit is hitting the fan and in what direction it is flinging.

Long story short.... everything is fucked. It's going to get a whole lot worse before it might get better.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

They're getting ahead of the bad news. Rumor has it that Russians have seized some pretty damning stuff--computers, files, laptops, etc--in Ukraine.

[–] • 0 pt

Something they view as even more damning needs covering up, so they can use this one which anyone who isn't a retard knows about already, and get people talking about it inatead of whatever they don't want us talking about.

[–] • 0 pt

That’s actually a good question.

I’m curious about that as well

[–] • 0 pt

It's the perfect time to come clean on the laptop - war (that most of us don't want any part of), inflation (driven by fuel prices), and I'm sure there's a third one...

[–] • 0 pt

That doesn’t explain why they even brought it up at all. They already had committed to a bullshit narrative long ago..

[–] • 1 pt

Yup, they killed it by censorship. There was no reason to bring it up again.

There's something definitely going on behind the scenes.

[–] • 0 pt

They got a copy of the hard drive along with the Washington Post and after what they discovered and what they knew the world was about to discover, they had to come clean.

[–] • 1 pt

They got a copy of it recently? Because I thought they got a copy over a year ago and then summarily dismissed it.

And even if they got a copy recently, why would that force them to admit anything? What would stop them from saying bullshit like “the pictures are photoshopped” or “the emails were planted”? Not to mention, they apparently have at least 50 liars from the IC community who will say whatever needs to be said to minimize it.

They clearly have the resources in place to whitewash and minimize literally anything.

I suppose your theory is a possibility, but seems very unlikely to me.

FFS, they have been able to convince WAAAY too many people that the last election wasn’t fraudulent when it was straight up stolen in front of God and everyone.

Load more (1 reply)