Which is why if someone (the video taker) is going to claim a thing, at the very least show the entire area for full context - so no ambiguity as to if the area has any other way in or out or is simply a closed off space. There is simply no way this proves or disproves the assertion.
I could make the same type of clip claiming any underground access way for plumbing maintenance is actually a super secret trafficking tunnel.
I'll be curious to see what details comes out of the lawsuit against major hotel chains, if they expose any secret spaces that were used for trafficking.
I reply here what i commented on your link -
Some NGO working party has re-defined 'human trafficking' as to also include 'willing Adults engaged in sex work'. I call bunk - those law suits are because Jonhs are bringing back willing sex workers - and the hotel is 'profiting' via room fees. Sex trafficking and human trafficking exists - this aint it.
Just read it in the other link. Quite plausible, they are always redefining words and moving goalposts. OTOH anyone transporting them long distances by car is going to need a room. Safer to traffic by car than by air.
(post is archived)