This is a bit silly. Wish the guy went into the first area to see where it went and if it was closed off - Clearly it seems the hotel has done remodeling in the past and this is for maintenance building access. The second one would be a shitty extra manhole to access under the floor in that area for plumbing, wiring or cable or whatever (the last house i was in had an extra 2 rooms added in the past, and because of how the foundations were originally set needed to cut an extra manhole in the new bedroom wardrobe to access underneath those two areas.)
What I was thinking as well.
Plus there is no need for this whatsoever. There are plenty of hotels that have adjoining rooms. This would serve the same purpose without the need for any 'secret passages'.
Yep - tbh i was actually expecting to see an adjoining door into a disused room.
Makes me wonder the point of hotel surveillance cams recording individuals arriving but never ever re-appearing again. smh.
Could just be silly, unless once discovered, these spaces are being used to stash kids or other nepharious activities. In the prior post I posted an article about major hotels being charged with facilitating human trafficking.
Which is why if someone (the video taker) is going to claim a thing, at the very least show the entire area for full context - so no ambiguity as to if the area has any other way in or out or is simply a closed off space. There is simply no way this proves or disproves the assertion.
I could make the same type of clip claiming any underground access way for plumbing maintenance is actually a super secret trafficking tunnel.
I'll be curious to see what details comes out of the lawsuit against major hotel chains, if they expose any secret spaces that were used for trafficking.
(post is archived)