![Crematoriums [1299x903 - 440KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/TUAP7Z.jpg){kind=link}
Most of the Jews that Nazis killed were not cremated, though.
The gas chambers is the argument the pro-holocaust folks say killed about half of the 6 million, 2 million were bullets to the head, and the rest were starvation.
The arguments should focus on the gas chambers and mass-death-firing squad kills, not the cremation.
Update your arguments. And most certainly don't use 4chan math that has multiple issues with it.
It's all the same argument. If you kill them you have to do something with the bodies. This side of the argument makes the gas chamber argument moot as regardless of the method of death, you sill have to dispose of the bodies.
All coke is radioactive. To cremate even 2 million bodies would have resulted in radioactive ash from the stacks. This would have created a radioactive silt layer around every single camp. To date, no radioactive silt layer near any of these camps have ever been discovered. While you're saying ignore this portion of the argument, this single and simple argument, in of itself, confirms millions of anyone's bodies were never cremated at or near these camps. Period. Add to this that the coal (coke) records confirm there wasn't enough coal to do it, and you've confimed the previous conclusion.
It's all the same argument. If you kill them you have to do something with the bodies. This side of the argument makes the gas chamber argument moot as regardless of the method of death, you sill have to dispose of the bodies.
Not true. Because they do not claim they were cremated. Mass graves is their argument. The "cremation" argument has never been a legitimate argument. It's a strawman. It targets a claim the Holocaust pushers (the actual holocaust pushers, not morons who don't know history and think the Nazis burned all the bodies) just do not push. The mass grave arguments should be the one pursued, not cremation.
Tell everyone you know to stop pushing the cremation argument to counter the holocaust pushers.
I believe the mass graves argument quickly leads to the same conclusion.
No, cremation is their argument, because Auschwitz is built in a swamp so burying the bodies would've created problems. The narrative is that Auschwitz cremated all the bodies that they created. If 4 million were murdered at Auschwitz (as proven at Nuremberg) then where did all the fuel come from?
(post is archived)