WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 8 pts

Don’t forget it was 11 million when we were kids.

They have conveniently dropped the supposed 5 million goyim from the holocaust conversation entirely.

[–] 5 pts

"why bother counting goyim! They don't matter. Remember, one pinky nail is worth more than Hundreds of goy."

And that's the way they believe. Horrible creatures.

[–] 2 pts

Wooden doors... But every kike born is considered a hoax survivor. It's all bullshit, you know.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Why did they need them alive during the 2020 election?

[–] 4 pts

Of course the actual method used for genocide is famine. As in every other instance ever.

Like what was done to indigenous Germans in both world wars.

Starve them to death

[–] 6 pts

Stalin starved millions, no one ever talks about it.

[–] 0 pt

Stalin want Russian yet cunts conflate ussr with Russians despite the thirty million body count and the anti Russian church programs.

Slight lies with massive ramifications

[–] 0 pt

Because stalin worked for the group that shall not be named

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Katyn forest massacre .

What is the holodomor.

[–] 0 pt

Holodomor was starvation son.

Katyn forest was assassination of a few leadership caste of Poland.

Wtf did you consider that a genocide. Do You not grasp its definition?

[–] 0 pt

10 million people intentionally killed. Almost a gorillion

[–] [deleted] 4 pts (edited )

Flawed analysis:

-Doesn’t include the energy of melted fat…think about the flare-ups on your barbecue grill. That’s a lot of energy.

-Does not consider the exothermic reaction that occurs when dehydrated flesh burns.

-Really poor assumption that the specific heat of warming up a body is constant over that huge temperature range. After the water is driven off (which is latent heat, not specific heat) say around 400F ( think of a roast in your oven) less energy is needed. With the flesh and fat on fire, little to no additional heat is needed.

-My understanding is that the fuel was actually wood, which the nazis made the joos cut.

I’m not advocating about the holohoax, but OPs analysis is really shitty.

[–] 6 pts (edited )

Nope. They were all coal fired. The Germans kept excellent records of all coal deliveries to these camps. Jews officially acknowledge this. However, their official rebuttal is that as Germany was falling the Nazi took time to destroy all their records and falsify all of the transportation records, especially including the coal records. Honk Honk.

Use of wood would have massively increased the workload to keep them at temp and would massively increased maintenance and downtime on the crematoriums because of all the ash, creosote, and other combustion byproducts associated with wood. In fact, it likely would have resulted in the destruction of the crematoriums.

His analysis is actually pretty good for napkin math. Your commentary says far more about you than his analysis.

No, it’s shitty for napkin math.

You must think you occupy a very high place with your pronouncements.

I wasn’t sure about the fuel. Coal is not ash or byproduct free either.

[–] 3 pts

All napkin math has assumed errors. The purpose is to put it into the ballpark. It's more honest and accurate than your position. lol.

https://poal.co/s/Holohoax/567507/955e92fb-24ab-421c-b854-dd1dc148b0b1

Of course a Jew is going to call himself a "white guy" while undermining whites. lol.

Hello Jew.

[–] 0 pt

Why do you capitalize jew?

[–] 0 pt

Why are you a Jew. Fuck off Jew.

[–] 2 pts

Freshly-cut wood burns poorly. It needs to be stored for weeks under shelter to be usable, especially for a CREMATORIUM.

Yeah, I store mine for a year before I even try to split it.

The dead bodies were temporarily stacked on the wood so it would dry faster.

[–] 2 pts

But I been to the Smithsonian and I seen the piles of shoes and the piles of eyeglasses, I also seen bricks and bunkbed pieces and other such like stuff.

I also seen movies, Schindler's List and also Piano Man or whatever it's called.

I also seen a Time/Life book with pictures. Plus TV documentaries, like BBC and History Channel.

[–] 3 pts

Wow! I guess you're right! How could it not be true with all that proof. All of the proof that was made by the people that died! Or they would have died if they hadn't miraculously been spared. All that proof that is constantly being shown to Everyone so that it is Never forgotten. All that proof that can not be questioned, most of the time under penalty of law! How could we have ever doubted that?

[–] 0 pt

You see what I'm sayin'...

But I don't know what your sayin

[–] 2 pts

Lol piano man

Billy Joel is also jewish

[–] 1 pt

history channel

Are they doing aliens or Hitler now? I don't miss tv. 5 years.

Looksi here my precious. All dem Jews turned into Biochar. Jews who became biochar then turned other Jews into Biochar. The Prussians were very efficient. The biochar that was left got used in the fields and forest. Jews are all over Germany and it has made it sacred ground to them.

[–] 1 pt

Thank you Shamus. I send stuff like this to people who I am trying to educate. It is a real eye opener for most of them. They, of course, have never even thought about anything like this. Once you get their old noggin joggin they start really thinking about it.

Look - the Holocaust was fake as shit; we all know that. But poke holes at what was actually claimed. All this write up does is make the deniers look foolish because it disputes something that was never said.

The claim: 6 million Jews died. some were burned, many were dumped in mass graves.

This writeup spends time talking about how long it would’ve taken to burn them all. That’s a non sequitur.

Instead, talk about how much energy would’ve been wasted burning any of them during a war, which wouldn’t have happened, and how the mass graves don’t exist. How wasting resources during a war to do all the repeated experiments wouldn’t have happened, how the images are all fake. There is so much fuckery that already exists, there is no need to waste time where it only makes us look bad.

[–] 0 pt

They should have used the Treblinka method of cremation. That only took some twigs or brush to cremate a cadaver. Hey, the witnesses said it so it must be true.

[–] 0 pt

Most of the Jews that Nazis killed were not cremated, though.

The gas chambers is the argument the pro-holocaust folks say killed about half of the 6 million, 2 million were bullets to the head, and the rest were starvation.

The arguments should focus on the gas chambers and mass-death-firing squad kills, not the cremation.

Update your arguments. And most certainly don't use 4chan math that has multiple issues with it.

[–] 3 pts

It's all the same argument. If you kill them you have to do something with the bodies. This side of the argument makes the gas chamber argument moot as regardless of the method of death, you sill have to dispose of the bodies.

All coke is radioactive. To cremate even 2 million bodies would have resulted in radioactive ash from the stacks. This would have created a radioactive silt layer around every single camp. To date, no radioactive silt layer near any of these camps have ever been discovered. While you're saying ignore this portion of the argument, this single and simple argument, in of itself, confirms millions of anyone's bodies were never cremated at or near these camps. Period. Add to this that the coal (coke) records confirm there wasn't enough coal to do it, and you've confimed the previous conclusion.

[–] 1 pt

It's all the same argument. If you kill them you have to do something with the bodies. This side of the argument makes the gas chamber argument moot as regardless of the method of death, you sill have to dispose of the bodies.

Not true. Because they do not claim they were cremated. Mass graves is their argument. The "cremation" argument has never been a legitimate argument. It's a strawman. It targets a claim the Holocaust pushers (the actual holocaust pushers, not morons who don't know history and think the Nazis burned all the bodies) just do not push. The mass grave arguments should be the one pursued, not cremation.

Tell everyone you know to stop pushing the cremation argument to counter the holocaust pushers.

[–] 0 pt

I believe the mass graves argument quickly leads to the same conclusion.

[–] 0 pt

No, cremation is their argument, because Auschwitz is built in a swamp so burying the bodies would've created problems. The narrative is that Auschwitz cremated all the bodies that they created. If 4 million were murdered at Auschwitz (as proven at Nuremberg) then where did all the fuel come from?