WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

398

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

Interesting history: It wasn't unusual to see small boys wearing dresses at that time. I've got pictures of my grandfather in a dress from this time period.

As a baby, it was easier to change the cloth diaper. And, as the boy grew up it was easier to potty train. Button up onesies wasn't a thing, and little kids made messes.

I can't tell from the picture if two of those boys are wearing dresses or just long overcoats. My guess is dresses.

Then they would grow out of that and wear shorts / pants when they were old enough not to piss themselves.

Such a simpler time when boys were boys and girls were girls and it didn't matter if a little boy was in a dress.

[–] 4 pts

This is pure unadulterated gold.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

I can imagine the arguments.

"You got to be executioner last time!"

"Why do I have to always be FDR?"

"Always a witness, never a actor."

[–] 3 pts

What's a harmless decapitation among friends?

[–] 2 pts

Look at that buildings architecture and decor. You can't find many brand new designs like that. Now it's all cookie cutter layouts.

Yep always that one jew kid in the neighborhood.

What a horrifying lack of diversity

[–] 1 pt

No diversity in sight!.