WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

[–] 0 pt (edited )

yes it is. that was what rome paid for. muhammad was at odds with jews, christians, and arabs because of his radicalism. he had little power until rome funded him. he took mecca then jerusalem. he was not popular but took jerusalem. it took centuries for rome to respond. The Antichrist Showdown! pt 26 - Islam [recruitment of Mohammed by vatican at 23 minutes] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydGs4k5Tx7Q

[–] 0 pt

that was what rome paid for.

Why would Rome pay Muhammad to take what already belongs to them?

[–] 0 pt

The Antichrist Showdown! pt 26 - Islam [recruitment of Mohammed by vatican at 23 minutes] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydGs4k5Tx7Q

[–] 0 pt

Oh you mean jews, the usual suspects.