Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.0K

In addition to other sources this more fully shows that jews are not only not from the region but have no relation to anyone from the region. They aren't Edomites, they aren't Canaanites (more so canaanites aren't related to Abraham1), they have zero relation to the tree of Abraham. Most importantly (???) they aren't Semites. Semites is not jew, Semite is not musjew.

Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'jew' or to call a contemporary (modern) jew as an Israelite or Hebrew. (pic8.co)

What can be gleaned from this; - Ancient Hebrew would seem to closely resemble the Phoenician, Greek and Latin. - 'Modern Hebrew' seems to be a Yiddish/Aramaic hodgepodge, with little connection to the ancient...

1 - I don't like how (seemingly intentionally) hidden and muddied the history of what a Canaanite is, is. Is it Noah's grandson (Canaan) or of a Fallen Angel + Eve? It can't be both, but Fallen Angel + Eve is the most applicable. This trash that jews are related to Abraham by Noah's grandson Canaan is just dumb, it pulls apart the entire Holy Bible and scripture.

In addition to other sources this more fully shows that jews are not only not from the region but have no relation to anyone from the region. They aren't Edomites, they aren't Canaanites (more so canaanites aren't related to Abraham^1), they have zero relation to the tree of Abraham. Most importantly (???) they aren't Semites. Semites is not jew, Semite is not musjew. >[Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'jew' or to call a contemporary (modern) jew as an Israelite or Hebrew.](https://pic8.co/sh/XuesHi.jpg) What can be gleaned from this; - Ancient Hebrew would seem to closely resemble the Phoenician, Greek and Latin. - 'Modern Hebrew' seems to be a Yiddish/Aramaic hodgepodge, with little connection to the ancient... ^1 - I don't like how (seemingly intentionally) hidden and muddied the history of what a Canaanite is, is. Is it Noah's grandson (Canaan) or of a Fallen Angel + Eve? It can't be both, but Fallen Angel + Eve is the most applicable. This trash that jews are related to Abraham by Noah's grandson Canaan is just dumb, it pulls apart the entire Holy Bible and scripture.

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts (edited )

I figured this out about a year or 2 ago, after reading an Irish bible. When the jews were in captivity in Babylon they took Aryan history, and claimed it as their own. They concealed and changed truths. Their kabbalah was stolen from the Kybalion.

Going back to the beginning the jews were originally called the igigi. They were created as a slave race but they rebelled.

Before Aryans showed up in Egypt we were in America.

[–] • 1 pt

Super fascinating, since Ptolemy translated the Hebrew into Greek - which became the Septuagint.

Demonstrating Trinity in the Old Testament is best done in what is available today - the Babylonian Hebrew, but this is really interesting.

[–] • 1 pt

More cope I see. Modern jews are decended from Khazars who converted to "modern judaism" (Phariseeism). When the Christ was resurrected, the natural path for jews was to become Christian. The Pharisees didn't want to let go of their power, wealth and influence, so they claimed the Christ was fraudulent, thus becoming antichrists. The Pharisees worked against the church, fraudulently claiming to be jews in the age of the Moshiach. Filthy Khazars converted to Phariseeism and falsely took the mantle of jew for themselves.

[–] • 1 pt

jews are Khazars jews become Christian

Fuck off kike. The pair of you new, kike accounts are so obvious and insufferable.

converted to phariseeism

jews don't convert to jews. Additionally, jews don't convert to Christianity. What do you think a crypto, converso, marrano is or any of a dozen other term for jew who lies about converstion but still hates Christianity b ut practices kikery? You and your jew friend are losing this and you only have your terrible, sub-85 IQ jew selves to blame.

fraudulently claiming to be jews

jew WAS NOT A THING during Christ's time. What in the fuck, bye.

[–] • 1 pt

>new

Quit being a nigger.

jews don't convert to jews. Additionally, jews don't convert to Christianity. What do you think a crypto, converso, marrano is or any of a dozen other term for jew who lies about converstion but still hates Christianity b ut practices kikery? You and your jew friend are losing this and you only have your terrible, sub-85 IQ jew selves to blame.

U wut m8? This is unhinged. jews became Christians, Pharisees rejected Christ to justify continuing their ways. Ashkenazi kikes are the descendents of Khazars. Nothing else makes sense, and nothing else is true. Die mad, faggot

[–] • 1 pt

The jews are descended from the Phoenicians, and yes, our history has been hidden from us. Jews of the Bible are not the same ethnic people as they are now, and the Jewish religion is very different than it was.

[–] • 0 pt

There were no "jews" in The Holy Bible. jew jews jewish judaism Are not in The Holy Bible. There was now "jewish" religion, by that name or any other name. It didn't exist as more than maybe an idea. There was Christianity, which existed before Christ whose namesake was gained after Christ, obviously. But the tennants of the religion existed and had nothing at all to do with jews.

Phoenicians

I have a nearly impossible time both accepting that and believing that. jews aren't from anywhere even close to the Med. So how the fuck are they somehow "From the Med"? That doesn't add up.This bit "jews are Phoenician" goes along with the jew lies of 'jews are Hebrew', ' jews are Khazars', 'jews are Ukrainians', 'jews are European', 'jews are White' and more. jews are none of the listed.

[–] • 2 pts

There is a group of people who infiltrate and take over institutions and cultures, and these people were once Phoenicians and now are what we would call non-Palestinian jews. The jews of the Bible have been absorbed by Christian cultures and Middle East cultures, such as Palestinians and Jordanians.

You are absolutely correct that the current religion is not at all the same religion of Christ. Those that did not recognize Christ as the Messiah were cursed. So your comment about pre-Christian and Christ is correct, but most people think of Jesus as coming from a jewish tradition and those that recognize Jesus as the son of God are Christian.

In reclaiming our history, it may not seem important to mention the Phonecians, but I’d encourage people to research this group, as they currently hold all power in our culture, country and in the rest of the world. Know your enemy.

Ashkenazi jews are from Khazaria, more recently, but the history of the people we call “jews” goes back millennia. They are pretenders, re-cloaking themselves in another form when they’ve been found out, so this isn’t an easy task.

When people claim, “it’s the jews,” they’re not wrong, as that is the current disguise this race wears. But it’s more complicated than that. They chose “judiaism” as the current cloak because Christians are sympathetic to the relatives of our Savior, but they are not the same people, they have co-opted the faith and turned it satanic.

Satanic because they have always been evil, and their god is satan, so that is how judaism has become obviously satanic. They are evil and they relish being associated with the murderers of the Messiah.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Phoenicians

No. They were pharisees. They were from nowhere from the region of the Mediterranean Sea. Why are you just ignoring that and starting with more lies

non-palestinian

You mean the fake state of palestine that didn't exist 2000 years ago? Why more jew lies? What are you doing? I'm done with your jewish take on reality. I answer every single lie in your post in my post you replied to. jews aren't Khazars, jews aren't Phoenicians, jews aren't White, jews aren't from the White, Christian state of

Syria-Palaestina

jews have no relation at all to the entirety of Europe through to Northern Africa and East through the made-up land of "the middle east".

It's obvious but curious how you rats come out of the sewers to such threads.

Christians are sympathetic to the relatives of our Savior,

Who are Christians themselves, but as you do lie (Rev 3:9), you're increasingly obvious from whose side you're cheering. Go instill jewish subversion elsewhere.

e; https://pic8.co/sh/2OAX5d.jpg (((you))) are literally intentionally conflating my previous post with some new jewish pilpul to try and get people to believe jews have any releation at all to Phoenicians when they don't.

[–] • 1 pt

Interesting. Maybe Asha will finally start to learn who really created the civilization in Near East.

[–] • 0 pt

What the fuck? What are you trying to say? He's been documenting that fact through hours and hours of video already. That's not news to him.

[–] • 1 pt

What I meant to say is that he is not very well informed on early influence of Illyrians on that region.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

You're completely wrong there. I don't blame you for that view, you may not have seen his twitter posts about this. He's explained how he does posts like this as drivers to plant the question in others' minds. Which is far more meaningful in getting through the lies than saying "no, that's false, here's proof".

For instance. I've simply told a bunch of people "Look up Simon of Trent.", that's it. They'll reply "What?" to which I'll reply "Look up Simon of Trent." Planting the seed is far superior than giving information. Indoctrination won't be taught over, it has to be "learned over".

e; Also he's not looking for "Sure but this is what it actually is and how it actually works." he's looking for the actual, physical, real evidence that's proof of those claims.