Hancock brings a ton of exposure to ancient temples and subterranean structures the scientism community ignores. Nada. He speaks to the obvious geological and paleontological evidence of a global flood. Crickets.
However, one interpretation of a strangely universal visual in ancient art, and they come out of the woodwork to scream, “Nuh uh! See! He’s a phony!”
Fucking idiots.
Hancock brings a ton of exposure to ancient temples and subterranean structures the *scientism* community ignores. Nada. He speaks to the obvious geological and paleontological evidence of a global flood. Crickets.
However, one interpretation of a strangely universal visual in ancient art, and they come out of the woodwork to scream, “Nuh uh! See! He’s a phony!”
Fucking idiots.
Oh I agree. I like Graham Hancock's body of work overall. It's not audacious to raise questions.
Oh I agree. I like Graham Hancock's body of work overall. It's not audacious to raise questions.
(post is archived)