Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] • 6 pts

"The Nazis Were Progressive Leftists"

This is the favorite Big Lie that (((Conservative, Inc. Media))) loves to push and rubes conservative love to believe because naturally their values and viewpoints align with Fascism but they don't want to be tainted with the Nazi label because Jewish control of media and education has made Nazis a pariah, worse than child rapists. When liberals call conservatives Fascist and Nazi they are mostly correct.

The Nazis fought against homosexualism, trannyism, pornography, obscenity, degeneracy, immigration, and Jews/Communism. They promoted law/order, patriarchy, traditionalism, militarism, scientific advancement, economic expansion, technological progress, healthy living, and the aesthetic ideal.

Does this sound like a blue haired, nose ringed, tattooed Berkley grad working at a San Francisco Starbucks?

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

They weren't remotely leftist but they were fairly progressive by Traditionalist standards. People today measure them by modern benchmarks but if you compare them to the regimes of the 19th century they were quite progressive, for instance promoting female emancipation and the opening up of the workforce to women, which was unthinkable for most of history for good reason. It wasn't a Nazi policy but Hitler was very much a progressive when it came to food and had some degenerate modernist vegetarian views including the belief that children should be kept from eating meat.

The problem is that almost all criticism of the Nazis comes from leftwards, so it's easy to view the Nazis as some sort of political extremity when in fact they really weren't all that right wing and had plenty of critics among far-right philosophers and writers.

[–] • 0 pt

The Nazis were cucks? I can get behind that.

[–] • 3 pts

as a result of hitlers policies, the german worker was able to keep more of his daily bread and property. he relaxed gun laws and opened churches. the only time items were encouraged to be brought in was during war when they needed the materials.

how exactly was hitler about collectivism?

[–] • 1 pt

Socialists are by definition about collectivism, utilities are all almost universally provided by the state alone w/ no competition. It grows from there until your wiping your ass with 'the people's bog roll' and have no choice in ur toilet paper like w/ communism.

[–] • 0 pt

socialism and national socialism are two different things though. the state of the nsdap was responsible for overseeing the health of the nation and economy, but there was still private enterprise.

[–] • 0 pt

"The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition," Harcourt explained in his article. Quite the opposite of what gun rights advocates like LaPierre say the law accomplished. The 1938 law allowed Nazi Party members and certain other groups favored by Hitler to own and carry guns with no restrictions at all. And the legal age for gun ownership was dropped from 20 to 18.

On the other hand, the law stripped gun ownership rights from Jews as well as other "non-Aryan" minorities persecuted by Hitler and the Nazis.

taking guns from people.... Being half slav in 1938 i wouldn't have had any gun rights. They disarm you, then they kill you... ofc hitler would eventually let slavs fight in the german army after he'd made so many mistakes he was losing the war

[–] • 2 pts

"Being half slav in 1938 i wouldn't have had any gun rights."

Being half slav means you would be a guest in Germany. Obey the house rules and be grateful they allow you do stay or get the fuck out.

[–] • 1 pt

Sorry kiddo, my rights are god given not manlet restricted.

[–] • 1 pt

vaccine mandates censorship tracking people and their wealth cancel culture

is authoritarian and all liberal policies

call it what you want

[–] • 1 pt

thats not entirely true. only people who were deemed enemies of the state were put in camps and if they were killed, it was for a good reason, i.e sabotage.

non aryans could live and work in germany as guest, they would just not be citizens. the "blonde hair blue eyed masterrace concept is jewish propoganda. now if you were a bolshevik... and openly subversive and hateful towards the state, you needed to worry.

[–] • 2 pts

I think the game of trying to associate the right/left with Nazism is childish. Putting Hitler in the same group as nigger-loving, child grooming, dysgenic fags is retarded.

[–] • 0 pt

and yet he had semitic muslim ss divisions

[–] • 1 pt

his racial ideology was more flexible than most realize for example their ally italy believed themselves the original aryans and said the others grew lighter over time. Hitler argued the opposite. Many instances of their ideology bend for whoever their ally happ to be. Wouldn't let slavs fight till the last years of the war when they were losing.... Their fear of soviets spies among their ranks is why slavs were deemed untermensch. Their philosophy bends to fit whatever they need at the time.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Those are specific issues. That Hitler was left in some issues is correct. That Hitler was left (generally) is incorrect.

The flawed reasoning is this:

If one requires 100% perfect right-wing orthodoxy for a movement to classify as right-wing,

one should also require 100% perfect left-wing orthodoxy for a movement to classify as left-wing

[–] • 0 pt

gun grabbing, public utility collectivizing, began as a campus movement employing the same tactics as antifa... but they're oblivious of it because b/c muh communism and don't see the close relation. the biggest point though is traditionally conservatives want small govt and it's damn hard to oppress a population w/ a tiny govt... these nightmares happen while under a bloated progressive govt w/ the size, power, and control of resources needed. Ur mixed up b/c the overton window in general was way further right back then in general than it is today. It's the same ideology, new veneer.

[–] • 1 pt

They were 'progressive' in science and technology, yes

[–] • 0 pt

and in social policy in some ways modern abortion is everybit eugenics reapproached, you must realize a clear majority off all parties thought homos etc disgusting at the time. I'm referring to collectivization.

[–] • 1 pt

Even on Poal, you'll find many positive posts on Hitler because those posters bought the left's lie. Nazis, fascists vs communists was left vs. left. I'm glad the article also pointed out that FDR the idiot dem was praising Mussolini. FDR did a lot of damage.