Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

"Ostensibly, the alliance was formed to instill the divine right of kings and Christian values in European political life, as pursued by Alexander I under the influence of his spiritual adviser Baroness Barbara von Krüdener."

why is this idiot taking advice from a woman? massive sign of weakness.

"On 29 September 1818, Alexander, Emperor Francis I of Austria and King Frederick William III of Prussia met with the Duke of Wellington, Viscount Castlereagh and the Duc de Richelieu at the Congress of Aix-la-Chapelle to demand stern measures against university "demagogues", which would be realized in the Carlsbad Decrees of the following year"

a decree which banned masonic frats in the universities. ooo big deal. if you knew the problem was coming from the universities then do a sting operation and execute them all. they hesitated to do this to not 'stir up' more of a response. it's always constant hesitation until the problem is too big to handle anymore. they still held state power back then. nowadays we know it's coming from the universities too but they also have state power so no one can do anything about it anymore.

"Ostensibly, the alliance was formed to instill the divine right of kings and Christian values in European political life, as pursued by Alexander I under the influence of his spiritual adviser Baroness Barbara von Krüdener." why is this idiot taking advice from a woman? massive sign of weakness. "On 29 September 1818, Alexander, Emperor Francis I of Austria and King Frederick William III of Prussia met with the Duke of Wellington, Viscount Castlereagh and the Duc de Richelieu at the Congress of Aix-la-Chapelle to demand stern measures against university "demagogues", which would be realized in the Carlsbad Decrees of the following year" a decree which banned masonic frats in the universities. ooo big deal. if you knew the problem was coming from the universities then do a sting operation and execute them all. they hesitated to do this to not 'stir up' more of a response. it's always constant hesitation until the problem is too big to handle anymore. they still held state power back then. nowadays we know it's coming from the universities too but they also have state power so no one can do anything about it anymore.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (9).
[–] • 0 pt

what? neither of them ever tried to genocide you..... :/ fuck me why is every cunt who replies to me on the internet so fucking stupid. can't any of you idiots ever argue using basic common sense?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

Nice fake history. Roman's rolled in enslaved and murdered everyone in range in Germania while subjecting them to demographic replacement. That is genocide fucktard.

Then the filthy catholics did the same to the germanics descendents. They did it to the frisians, the saxxons, to the Scandinavias, to the cathars, to the balts and everyone else in the region save some a handful of tiny states that converted on their own, but apparently you missed history class, maybe you were busy dancing or reading catholic propaganda about love conquering all. And the need for some liar pushing yid fairy tails to rule over everyone that's too cowardly to face being a human.

But in the end God thought it would be hilarious if the lowly backwoods germanics brought the mighty, arrogant and blasphemous Roman's to heal. Then he saw fit to have them do the same to the shifty catholics for corrupting everything and being thw exact opposite of their holy book tells them to be.

[–] • 0 pt

We know quite clearly what the Romans would have done to Germania because we have Gaul as the perfect next door example. So no you're just talking shit. Rome conquering Germania would've proved a massive boost for the Germanic peoples making them more advanced nigh overnight.

And no the Catholics didn't genocide any of them, they fought wars and subdued those regions. After winning they had ample opportunity to conduct a genocide. It never happened you idiot. The cathars on other hand were a subversive sect and a different story but the church was right to crack down on them, in fact they hesitated too long before doing it, only after the cathars slaughtered the catholic dignitaries did they respond, and i say that as someone who thinks christianity is jewish subversion in the first place. The cathars were what the original jewish subversionists attempted.. to encourage all christians to not have children, that satan ruled the material world and only he could be propitiated on earth and that god had no influence in this realm and that they should all basically kill themselves to go to god's kingdom instead.

We're now talking about completely different subjects to the original reply and still you manage to get everything wrong. LOL

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

You forgot about the enslavement of most of the population and demographic replacement that occurred in Gaul. But yeah there would have been some public baths they could watch the aristocrats bath in as they got raped and forced to kill each other in games or crucified for just about any reason.

The catholics most certainly did genocide anyone that resisted and there are numerous examples of it that I just listed. They depopulated entire regions while "subduing them". And forced them into serfdom.

We aren't your fucking serfs faggot.