So just one speech where he is explicitly talking about Catholics? How can a Catholic say that truth does not matter?
Read what Pope Pius XI wrote in 1937: https://www.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_14031937_mit-brennender-sorge.html
And no, that is only one speech just off the top of my head.
Hitler wanted to separate Politics from the Church and said they are two different realms. The Vatican did NOT support it at all. I made a post on mit brennendar sorge, it is a Judeo-masonic letter meant to divide Germany.
Go read point 24 of the 25 point party program.
Edit: here I got it for you guys to save some time
- We demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the state so long as they do not endanger its existence or oppose the moral senses of the German nation. The Party as such advocates the standpoint of a positive Christianity without binding itself confessionally to any one denomination. It combats the Jewish materialistic spirit within and around us and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our nation can only succeed from within on the framework: common utility precedes individual utility.
You mean separation of Church and State. Separation of Church and state is not a Catholic teaching. Freedom of religion is also not a Catholic teaching.
What is the following from?
We demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the state so long as they do not endanger its existence or oppose the moral senses of the German nation. The Party as such advocates the standpoint of a positive Christianity without binding itself confessionally to any one denomination. It combats the Jewish materialistic spirit within and around us and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our nation can only succeed from within on the framework: common utility precedes individual utility.
This is not in MIT BRENNENDER SORGE and where in MIT BRENNENDER SORGE makes you believe it is was to divide Germany?
I didnt say that quote is in Mit Brennendar Sorge reetz. I literally said its from the 25 point party program of the NSDAP and yes Im aware catholics do not believe in a separation of Church and Politics, that is what Hitler wanted to cleanse the clergy of. My gosh do you even read a fucking word.
If you don't even know what the economic program was than clearly your in the wrong place.
Separation of the Church and the state is intrinsically tied to the Separation of Church and Politics.
He is talking about the clergy, which should be known was trying to assert political dominance, and attacked the NSDAP most notably by means of agitation through the Mit brennender Sorge a Judeo-masonic letter sent to bishops of Germany in order to create a division between the Church and the state, thus the claims of post-war enlightenment become “common knowledge,” as the “Nazi attack on Christianity.” Likewise America had the same slanderous propaganda campaign which is shown in a few cartoons showing Germans destroying churches and stabbing bibles.
The letter literally claims Germans are holding an idolatry over the state and becoming Godless. Which was never even true, how can you deny the holocaust but then appease to the same post-enlightenment on a different subject?
it is irrelevant what is and isnt catholic teaching, as they would prefer us to return to illiteracy so we couldnt read the bible ourselves.
So just one speech where he is explicitly talking about Catholics? How can a Catholic say that truth does not matter?
It was pretty clearly just a statement of fact, not a spiritual belief, please explain how anything matters more than victory? If you do not have victory then you also lose truth automatically, just looks at the total myth of the holohoax.
How can you have truth if you reject it for temporal victory?
[36] For what shall it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer damage of his soul? [Mark 8:36]
How can you have truth if you reject it for temporal victory?
Hitler had truth on his side, it is only because of his lack of victory that you think he did not. Indeed if he'd won he'd be considered among the greatest men in history.
literally proving my point.
(post is archived)