> First, never heard of the site so I'm not clicking on it. Shit argument. How did you discover this backwater site if you don't click on things you don't recognize? > Second, [...] almost everyone I've ever encountered who supports flat earth What? Even if that statistical relation were true, [it is the gamblers fallacy to apply it to me](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler%27s_fallacy) (you've heard of Wikipedia, right?), and I never even mentioned flat earth. Actually, flat earth is an attempt to discredit by association, much as they attached druggies and otherwise losers to the antiwar efforts of the 60s (which originally included PhDs, many academics, etc) to discredit them similarly by association. It worked. They then used the strategy again during the Occupy Wall Street protests, when they attached 'antiestablishment bums' to what was originally a semi-conservative cause. This was also successful.