The Byzantine Empire [576x640 - 92KB] | Poal: Say what you want.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

As for there being no secular philosophy that can do the same on the right* I think there is a lot of basis for this, you actually have to just think about it in the first place and it is easily come up with. The secret is in an honest analysis of the principles of evolution and heredity as it applies to the White Race of Human beings, it's an old set of ideas that the left has done it's best to cover up, but it predates the marxist view of the world, and is very unifying and exclusionary and supportive of White Nationalism, Exceptionalism, and even Supremacy.

What is it that makes you, you? The physical composition that makes up your body are not unique to you, most people are made of the same ingredients, the answer is how it is all put together, and that is the result of your genetic blueprint, your genetic code is the core of your uniqueness. (Before you bring up environment, you should keep in mind that the way you are affected by environmental factors is determined by your genetics.)

So, where does this "essence of you" come from? half of it comes from each of your parents, and where did they get theirs, half from each of their parents, some of it may be transferred in such a way as to be different from the copy that exists in the parent that made you, but even this mutated gene is something that came from one of your parents. A philosophical point comes from this, that you are made of your ancestors, every part of what makes you uniquely yourself has come from the uniqueness of the predecessors that came before you, you are them, and they are you.

You have every right to feel pride for the accomplishments of your ancestors and every right to feel shame for their failures, more importantly, you have every reason to feel connected to those who share a genetic similarity with you, in proportion to their genetic similarity with yourself, on a primal level. Furthermore, this also means that you have a moral obligation to all living things that is proportionate to their genetic similarity to yourself, racism is morally justified by even the basics of heredity, you have every cause to favor a member of your race over someone from another race, because you really do have a greater connection to them and a greater level of moral priority to them.

Why do I attach "moral obligation" to this? because evolution is the origin of all morals, and it has purposes and imperatives built into it, the purpose of life, which drives all aspects of yourself, and which has shaped and molded life into the shape of you, has worked towards a a single driving goal: To ensure the survival and propagation of copies of your genes, so that a part of you moves on to the next generations, this can be done directly, via having children and ensuring they have children and so on, and indirectly, through aiding in the reproduction of those who share genetic similarity with yourself, as well as that of their offspring.

If there was one objective moral principle, and one purpose to life, than this is it, whether you view it as fulfilling or disappointing is wholly up to you. For me, the concept of serving some ill-defined God and going to Heaven is depressing as a purpose to life, it is wholly concerned with the relationship between yourself and God, and terminates at your death, it also makes this world unimportant and makes humans interchangeable and expendable, but for a Christian, it's fulfilling. Either can be characterized as being driven by something greater than yourself and being a player in a grand plan.

Take a look at the media, people who say that the power of the media is the ability to mislead and deceive are wrong, the real power is their ability to manipulate emotions and perspectives, they can command how people feel in response to stimuli, and determine how people perceive what they see. that is their true power, to manipulate the heart, not the head, to bypass the rational brain and go straight for the reptile center of it all. Facts don't matter, feelings do, because if you control the feelings, you control how people respond to the facts, and how they interpret the significance and importance of the facts to themselves.

In this way, the appeal of either philosophy to yourself is dependent upon the sales campaign that came with them, the facts themselves aren't what make your ideas of life and ethics transcendent or disappointing, the real factor here is in how you are conditioned to perceive these things.

Here's another take, straight out of the latest "murdoch murdoch" episode: conscious life is the way for the universe to know itself, and the more sophisticated the consciousness, the more the universe prefers the rise and preservation of it, the white race has a unique capacity for having the highest level of consciousness of all the races of mankind, and if we preserve ourselves and what makes us unique in this regard, we will only advance to a higher and higher state with each generation.

The White man also has the genetics with the greatest level of potential of all the life on Earth, we are the only ones with the potential to take the life borne of this rock and allowing some part of it to outlive the fate of the planet which has spawned it, if anything from this place is going to escape to the stars from the end of it's planet of origin, it's going to a form of life that rose from the unique genetic profile of the White man.

There's more such insights out there, of course, such as that whites are currently like a team that is made to feel guilty for it's past victories. We should be hearing the stories of how we conquered, enslaved, oppressed, or exterminated other peoples and feel proud of it, those were victories, achievements, not something to bemoan but to celebrate.

The Jews greatest subversion of ourselves is in that they made us see the good things our ancestors had done, the past triumphs of our kind over their competition, and feel bad about them. Their worst act upon our people was not the spread of false facts, but the manipulation of how we feel about the world and it's history. We should be recounting these tales with pride, wanting to hear them over and over again. Not be in the state we are in now, where we react to the past testament of our kind's supremacy with horror and shame.

it's wrong feelings we need to fight against, it's bad perspectives we need to correct, the facts are fine in whatever state the Jews give them to us, what needs to be corrected is how we react to them.

What you fail to see is that the left HAS a morality, in fact, their are zealots for it. Their moral standards are very important to them, and very good at uniting them, and being a basis for exclusion. They have a bad and wrong morality, and they are dishonest about it's true nature, but they don't lack one entirely, a moral philosophy is definitely there among those types, saying the Left doesn't have morals is like saying the Muslims don't have a religion. As for there being no secular philosophy that can do the same on the right* I think there is a lot of basis for this, you actually have to just think about it in the first place and it is easily come up with. The secret is in an honest analysis of the principles of evolution and heredity as it applies to the White Race of Human beings, it's an old set of ideas that the left has done it's best to cover up, but it predates the marxist view of the world, and is very unifying and exclusionary and supportive of White Nationalism, Exceptionalism, and even Supremacy. What is it that makes you, you? The physical composition that makes up your body are not unique to you, most people are made of the same ingredients, the answer is how it is all put together, and that is the result of your genetic blueprint, your genetic code is the core of your uniqueness. (Before you bring up environment, you should keep in mind that the way you are affected by environmental factors is determined by your genetics.) So, where does this "essence of you" come from? half of it comes from each of your parents, and where did they get theirs, half from each of their parents, some of it may be transferred in such a way as to be different from the copy that exists in the parent that made you, but even this mutated gene is something that came from one of your parents. A philosophical point comes from this, that you are made of your ancestors, every part of what makes you uniquely yourself has come from the uniqueness of the predecessors that came before you, you are them, and they are you. You have every right to feel pride for the accomplishments of your ancestors and every right to feel shame for their failures, more importantly, you have every reason to feel connected to those who share a genetic similarity with you, in proportion to their genetic similarity with yourself, on a primal level. Furthermore, this also means that you have a moral obligation to all living things that is proportionate to their genetic similarity to yourself, racism is morally justified by even the basics of heredity, you have every cause to favor a member of your race over someone from another race, because you really do have a greater connection to them and a greater level of moral priority to them. Why do I attach "moral obligation" to this? because evolution is the origin of all morals, and it has purposes and imperatives built into it, the purpose of life, which drives all aspects of yourself, and which has shaped and molded life into the shape of you, has worked towards a a single driving goal: To ensure the survival and propagation of copies of your genes, so that a part of you moves on to the next generations, this can be done directly, via having children and ensuring they have children and so on, and indirectly, through aiding in the reproduction of those who share genetic similarity with yourself, as well as that of their offspring. If there was one objective moral principle, and one purpose to life, than this is it, whether you view it as fulfilling or disappointing is wholly up to you. For me, the concept of serving some ill-defined God and going to Heaven is depressing as a purpose to life, it is wholly concerned with the relationship between yourself and God, and terminates at your death, it also makes this world unimportant and makes humans interchangeable and expendable, but for a Christian, it's fulfilling. Either can be characterized as being driven by something greater than yourself and being a player in a grand plan. Take a look at the media, people who say that the power of the media is the ability to mislead and deceive are wrong, the real power is their ability to manipulate emotions and perspectives, they can command how people feel in response to stimuli, and determine how people perceive what they see. that is their true power, to manipulate the heart, not the head, to bypass the rational brain and go straight for the reptile center of it all. Facts don't matter, feelings do, because if you control the feelings, you control how people respond to the facts, and how they interpret the significance and importance of the facts to themselves. In this way, the appeal of either philosophy to yourself is dependent upon the sales campaign that came with them, the facts themselves aren't what make your ideas of life and ethics transcendent or disappointing, the real factor here is in how you are conditioned to perceive these things. Here's another take, straight out of the latest "murdoch murdoch" episode: conscious life is the way for the universe to know itself, and the more sophisticated the consciousness, the more the universe prefers the rise and preservation of it, the white race has a unique capacity for having the highest level of consciousness of all the races of mankind, and if we preserve ourselves and what makes us unique in this regard, we will only advance to a higher and higher state with each generation. The White man also has the genetics with the greatest level of potential of all the life on Earth, we are the only ones with the potential to take the life borne of this rock and allowing some part of it to outlive the fate of the planet which has spawned it, if anything from this place is going to escape to the stars from the end of it's planet of origin, it's going to a form of life that rose from the unique genetic profile of the White man. There's more such insights out there, of course, such as that whites are currently like a team that is made to feel guilty for it's past victories. We should be hearing the stories of how we conquered, enslaved, oppressed, or exterminated other peoples and feel proud of it, those were victories, achievements, not something to bemoan but to celebrate. The Jews greatest subversion of ourselves is in that they made us see the good things our ancestors had done, the past triumphs of our kind over their competition, and feel bad about them. Their worst act upon our people was not the spread of false facts, but the manipulation of how we feel about the world and it's history. We should be recounting these tales with pride, wanting to hear them over and over again. Not be in the state we are in now, where we react to the past testament of our kind's supremacy with horror and shame. it's wrong feelings we need to fight against, it's bad perspectives we need to correct, the facts are fine in whatever state the Jews give them to us, what needs to be corrected is how we react to them.

link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

My philosophy is at least able to be followed, Christianity is tied to the bible and bound to the words of Jesus before all else, and Jesus' commandments are not at all practical.

People bring up the one act of violence at the temple steps over and over, but forget that as the incarnation of God, Jesus can break any laws he wants. what may do might be sinful for us if we were to do it. You have to concern yourself with the red text, the words of Christ, when it comes to what you are commanded to, and his words are not at all conducive to the survival of a people: . Other times people bring up the Old Testament, just as a Jew shapeshifts between being White or being Jewish, the Christian changes his mind on whether the OT laws apply depending upon the situation, it applies when he wants to be badass with strong principles, but doesn't when it makes him look like a degenerate judeophile, it seems the opinions of others on sites like these outweigh their loyalties to God. The proper interpretation, is to accept that the OT applies EXCEPT in cases where Jesus' words contradict them, the gospel of Christ takes priority over anything God had previously said, because Jesus is his latest interpretation and most direct communication to mankind.

Sell all your belongings and give all your money away (he also say's "buy a sword", but this is symbolic speech for "take up the gospel" as Jesus' words are the "sword" that "divides the houses of the Jews" in a schism between his ministry and the existing Jewish authorities. Which is an intentional misleading statement of his, since he fails to mention the many other schisms occurring alongside his won led by other Jews who were also claiming to be the messiah, many of whom had also been executed, and of those there were many who came back from the dead to reveal themselves as conquering death, we had a legion of Jesus')
Welcome foreigners and strangers into your homes to live with you, feed the hungry and tend to the sick, give charity to the impoverished. Jesus was definitely a "refugees welcome" kind of guy, fitting since he was a rabbi.
Do good to those who do evil towards you, when struck, welcome more blows, when robbed, offer more to the thief than he asks for, when enslaved, serve your masters well and do not rebel against them. Yes, Jesus said that if his followers were slaves, they should be good slaves. Christians on here love pretending Jesus didn't say the things he is known for saying, this also neuters the famous lines of how much Jesus hated the Pharisees, because even if he did, he commands us to love those who are our enemies, to do good to them, and to obey them, not to fight them, the famous line "he did not kill his enemies, he loved them, tried to save them, and forgave them for their transgressions against him".
You must hate your family, your race, yourself, and all upon the earth in order to follow Jesus, meaning to have no concern for what happens to the guy next to you, or to what will happen to you after that, all you must be concerned with is obeying the commandments of Jesus. ^This explicitly addresses those who talk about the practical consequences of following Jesus by obeying his commands, which is Christians being purged from the Earth by their enemies, but none of that would matter to someone who actually abides by the ted text, which tells us right here not to give a shit about such things, those are earthly matters, and so long as you and your fellow Christians get to heaven, the rest of the world, that you leave behind, can go fuck itself. Basically, fighting off the Muslims and driving them out of Europe is not in line with Christianity, and those who did it damned themselves unless they sought forgiveness for it afterwards, because even in cases of self-defense, Jesus explicitly tells us not to do that, and to ignore the consequences of submitting to one's enemies, as he commands his followers to do. The Christian church can only survive by ignoring or intentionally misinterpreting the words of it's founder, at that point the claim to be a source of morality is rendered absolutely void. If a Christian violates the word of God and does not count it as a sin, then he is operating on another moral system. Whatever the Christians of Poal follow, it's not Christ, if they LARP as these badass Christian warriors, then what the follow are the Earthly pastors and popes, who right now are all completely jewed and have been for most of their recorded history.
Most importantly, Jesus had an even worse opinion on Gentiles than he did on the pharisees, he at least saw the pharisees as his own people who should be saved, Gentiles were clearly worse in his eyes. Gentiles are "dogs" who are only entitled to the "scraps from the tables of their masters", meaning that Gentiles are slaves of the Jews, and only intended to receive that which the Jews do not want for themselves, and cast away, this is basically the view the kikes have of their pet Shabbos Goyim. This point is made more clear in another quote, that Jesus said his salvation is only for the Jews, not for the Gentiles, and that only Jews may follow him. ^For those Christians here who love their alternative history, remember that Jesus shits on the best of western civilizations, he talks negatively about the ancient Egyptians (who were White), and the Romans (who were yet another great White civilization that was the America of their time), had he lived in the modern age, he would be in good company with those who talk about how evil every country founded by White men was/is. Your Jesus was no fan of White western civilization, on that point, he has more in common with those you despise.
"render unto Ceasar what is Ceasar's and render unto God what is God's" a famous line that shows how Jesus was no rebel, but a chickenshit coward when given even the slightest ability to confront those he railed against. So Jesus spends a lot of his time telling his disciples how horrible the Romans are and how he wants Jews to take over, until roman tax collectors come to get their dues from him and his followers. Now the Romans don't give much of a fuck about the various communities that live inside their empire, they can even have their own system of law so long as they keep to themselves and pay their taxes, but everyone knows that if you try to refuse or cheat the tax collectors, or if you start shit with the Roman people, you will be brutally suppressed and destroyed, Hadrian-style. Taxes are no joke in the roman empire, and the Romans keep good track of them. So the first thing any rebellion would do is tell the Tax collectors to go fuck off, and Jesus' followers were expecting at least this from their messiah, he has the power of God, after all. Nope, Jesus pisses himself and gives into tyranny, not even non-violent resistance against these Gentiles who he spent his sermons cursing out as wicked and tyrannical persecutors of his people, then he makes excuses for his hypocrisy. If Jesus and his followers were not Jews, they certainly acted like them. Your idea of Jesus as this kickass rebel is pure cope, and has been for the whole of the history of the Christian church.

So basically, you cannot follow Jesus, and if you don't follow his commands, then you cant claim your morality or purpose comes from Christianity, morals are unshakable, they aren't something that can be ignored for personal convenience, if you have an unrealistic set of morals that you have to set aside in order to function, then your moral system needs o be replaced with one that is more compatible with the way you will live your life.

My philosophy works, there is no need to set it aside, and it is wholly compatible with my politics, in fact, the secular science based philosophical view, is far more compatible with White Right politics than Christianity is, Christianity is more compatible with the left, which is why the controlled opposition left (cuckservatives and lolbergs) loves it so much, the only reason the rest of the left doesn't follow it is because it is replaced by a competing religion that is even more compatible with their politics (marxism/talmudism). Jews hate Jesus because he led a schism that divided their community and became popular with Gentiles, who the Jews despise, it also provides churches, where Whites gather amongst themselves and thus mitigate the influence of the Jews over them. There is nothing in Christ's actual words that challenge them, which is why they love to quote him so much.

Christianity is not good for us, it's not protective against Jewish subversion, throughout the feudal ages the nobility was wholly i the pocket of the Jews, and so was the Catholic church, the largest Christian church in Europe, it was only a matter of time before they took over the protestant institutions as well. The highest peak of Christianity in America was the 80's, by then most of the worst damaging policies had been put into place under the rulership of especially devout Christians.

Jews love to try and promote Christianity among the right, think of all those gatekeepers and cointelpro shills, one thing they all have in common is glowing regard for Christianity, and promoting more of it as the solution to our world's problems, which they blame on a lack of it. If the only difference between a fake Christian and a true one is that they agree with you on extra-biblical matters, than you are pulling a classic fallacy.

Lots of them are Jewish, and Zionists, but so was Jesus and his disciples, the ones whose words and accounts fill the NT, if being Jewish exempts the gatekeepers and counter-op shills, than why doesn't it disualify these people? Yes, Christ and his men were Jews, even if their ethnicity was actually Gentile, they were born and raised in Jewish comunities, Jesus was Jewish enough t be made into a Rabbi, they worshipped the same God as the Jews (When Jesus stormed a Jewish temple's steps too chase off money changers, he called the God of the Jews his father), They were circumcised in keeping with the covenant of Abraham, they recognized the Jewish oral laws and history as authoritative, they observed the Jewish-specific holidays (like passover, a celebration of the mass murder to Egyptians), they dressed like Jews, Spoke like Jews, and acted like Jews, one of Jesus' miracles was multiplying fish and bread for fuck's sake, do you not see the significance of those foods? Jesus was the messiah of the prophecy that was made by Jews for Jews. Most of all, Jesus lived like a Jew, in a Jewish community within the Roman empire, rootless parasites that hate their gracious hosts and seek to destroy them, building nothing, contributing nothing, seeking the destruction of everything.

Jesus even broke his promise, he said that the rapture would occur when one of his disciples was still alive, he claimed that the Garden of Eden was real, which means somewhere on earth is a garden with fruits that make you immortal and it has a gate guarded by an angel armed with a flaming sword that moves in every direction to prevent access by mortal men. both of these turned out not to be true.

Just like how the Bible lied about the Earth being a flat plane covered by a solid "firmament" that separates us from the waters of the cosmos, with windows in it through which God allows these waters to pass when it rains, basically making our word a giant snow globe drifting in water.

*Note: I'm putting cuckservatives and lolbergs on the left with the liberals, socialists, and communists, and only talking about the "White Right" here as the only groups worthy of the "Right-Wing" title.

My philosophy is at least able to be followed, Christianity is tied to the bible and bound to the words of Jesus before all else, and Jesus' commandments are not at all practical. People bring up the one act of violence at the temple steps over and over, but forget that as the incarnation of God, Jesus can break any laws he wants. what may do might be sinful for us if we were to do it. You have to concern yourself with the red text, the words of Christ, when it comes to what you are commanded to, and his words are not at all conducive to the survival of a people: . Other times people bring up the Old Testament, just as a Jew shapeshifts between being White or being Jewish, the Christian changes his mind on whether the OT laws apply depending upon the situation, it applies when he wants to be badass with strong principles, but doesn't when it makes him look like a degenerate judeophile, it seems the opinions of others on sites like these outweigh their loyalties to God. The proper interpretation, is to accept that the OT applies EXCEPT in cases where Jesus' words contradict them, the gospel of Christ takes priority over anything God had previously said, because Jesus is his latest interpretation and most direct communication to mankind. - Sell all your belongings and give all your money away (he also say's "buy a sword", but this is symbolic speech for "take up the gospel" as Jesus' words are the "sword" that "divides the houses of the Jews" in a schism between his ministry and the existing Jewish authorities. Which is an intentional misleading statement of his, since he fails to mention the many other schisms occurring alongside his won led by other Jews who were also claiming to be the messiah, many of whom had also been executed, and of those there were many who came back from the dead to reveal themselves as conquering death, we had a legion of Jesus') - Welcome foreigners and strangers into your homes to live with you, feed the hungry and tend to the sick, give charity to the impoverished. Jesus was definitely a "refugees welcome" kind of guy, fitting since he was a rabbi. - Do good to those who do evil towards you, when struck, welcome more blows, when robbed, offer more to the thief than he asks for, when enslaved, serve your masters well and do not rebel against them. Yes, Jesus said that if his followers were slaves, they should be good slaves. Christians on here love pretending Jesus didn't say the things he is known for saying, this also neuters the famous lines of how much Jesus hated the Pharisees, because even if he did, he commands us to love those who are our enemies, to do good to them, and to obey them, not to fight them, the famous line "he did not kill his enemies, he loved them, tried to save them, and forgave them for their transgressions against him". - You must hate your family, your race, yourself, and all upon the earth in order to follow Jesus, meaning to have no concern for what happens to the guy next to you, or to what will happen to you after that, all you must be concerned with is obeying the commandments of Jesus. ^This explicitly addresses those who talk about the practical consequences of following Jesus by obeying his commands, which is Christians being purged from the Earth by their enemies, but none of that would matter to someone who actually abides by the ted text, which tells us right here not to give a shit about such things, those are earthly matters, and so long as you and your fellow Christians get to heaven, the rest of the world, that you leave behind, can go fuck itself. Basically, fighting off the Muslims and driving them out of Europe is not in line with Christianity, and those who did it damned themselves unless they sought forgiveness for it afterwards, because even in cases of self-defense, Jesus explicitly tells us not to do that, and to ignore the consequences of submitting to one's enemies, as he commands his followers to do. The Christian church can only survive by ignoring or intentionally misinterpreting the words of it's founder, at that point the claim to be a source of morality is rendered absolutely void. If a Christian violates the word of God and does not count it as a sin, then he is operating on another moral system. Whatever the Christians of Poal follow, it's not Christ, if they LARP as these badass Christian warriors, then what the follow are the Earthly pastors and popes, who right now are all completely jewed and have been for most of their recorded history. - Most importantly, Jesus had an even worse opinion on Gentiles than he did on the pharisees, he at least saw the pharisees as his own people who should be saved, Gentiles were clearly worse in his eyes. Gentiles are "dogs" who are only entitled to the "scraps from the tables of their masters", meaning that Gentiles are slaves of the Jews, and only intended to receive that which the Jews do not want for themselves, and cast away, this is basically the view the kikes have of their pet Shabbos Goyim. This point is made more clear in another quote, that Jesus said his salvation is only for the Jews, not for the Gentiles, and that only Jews may follow him. ^For those Christians here who love their alternative history, remember that Jesus shits on the best of western civilizations, he talks negatively about the ancient Egyptians (who were White), and the Romans (who were yet another great White civilization that was the America of their time), had he lived in the modern age, he would be in good company with those who talk about how evil every country founded by White men was/is. Your Jesus was no fan of White western civilization, on that point, he has more in common with those you despise. - "render unto Ceasar what is Ceasar's and render unto God what is God's" a famous line that shows how Jesus was no rebel, but a chickenshit coward when given even the slightest ability to confront those he railed against. So Jesus spends a lot of his time telling his disciples how horrible the Romans are and how he wants Jews to take over, until roman tax collectors come to get their dues from him and his followers. Now the Romans don't give much of a fuck about the various communities that live inside their empire, they can even have their own system of law so long as they keep to themselves and pay their taxes, but everyone knows that if you try to refuse or cheat the tax collectors, or if you start shit with the Roman people, you will be brutally suppressed and destroyed, Hadrian-style. Taxes are no joke in the roman empire, and the Romans keep good track of them. So the first thing any rebellion would do is tell the Tax collectors to go fuck off, and Jesus' followers were expecting at least this from their messiah, he has the power of God, after all. Nope, Jesus pisses himself and gives into tyranny, not even non-violent resistance against these Gentiles who he spent his sermons cursing out as wicked and tyrannical persecutors of his people, then he makes excuses for his hypocrisy. If Jesus and his followers were not Jews, they certainly acted like them. Your idea of Jesus as this kickass rebel is pure cope, and has been for the whole of the history of the Christian church. So basically, you cannot follow Jesus, and if you don't follow his commands, then you cant claim your morality or purpose comes from Christianity, morals are unshakable, they aren't something that can be ignored for personal convenience, if you have an unrealistic set of morals that you have to set aside in order to function, then your moral system needs o be replaced with one that is more compatible with the way you will live your life. My philosophy works, there is no need to set it aside, and it is wholly compatible with my politics, in fact, the secular science based philosophical view, is far more compatible with White Right politics than Christianity is, Christianity is more compatible with the left, which is why the controlled opposition left (cuckservatives and lolbergs) loves it so much, the only reason the rest of the left doesn't follow it is because it is replaced by a competing religion that is even more compatible with their politics (marxism/talmudism). Jews hate Jesus because he led a schism that divided their community and became popular with Gentiles, who the Jews despise, it also provides churches, where Whites gather amongst themselves and thus mitigate the influence of the Jews over them. There is nothing in Christ's actual words that challenge them, which is why they love to quote him so much. Christianity is not good for us, it's not protective against Jewish subversion, throughout the feudal ages the nobility was wholly i the pocket of the Jews, and so was the Catholic church, the largest Christian church in Europe, it was only a matter of time before they took over the protestant institutions as well. The highest peak of Christianity in America was the 80's, by then most of the worst damaging policies had been put into place under the rulership of especially devout Christians. Jews love to try and promote Christianity among the right, think of all those gatekeepers and cointelpro shills, one thing they all have in common is glowing regard for Christianity, and promoting more of it as the solution to our world's problems, which they blame on a lack of it. If the only difference between a fake Christian and a true one is that they agree with you on extra-biblical matters, than you are pulling a classic fallacy. Lots of them are Jewish, and Zionists, but so was Jesus and his disciples, the ones whose words and accounts fill the NT, if being Jewish exempts the gatekeepers and counter-op shills, than why doesn't it disualify these people? Yes, Christ and his men were Jews, even if their ethnicity was actually Gentile, they were born and raised in Jewish comunities, Jesus was Jewish enough t be made into a Rabbi, they worshipped the same God as the Jews (When Jesus stormed a Jewish temple's steps too chase off money changers, he called the God of the Jews his father), They were circumcised in keeping with the covenant of Abraham, they recognized the Jewish oral laws and history as authoritative, they observed the Jewish-specific holidays (like passover, a celebration of the mass murder to Egyptians), they dressed like Jews, Spoke like Jews, and acted like Jews, one of Jesus' miracles was multiplying fish and bread for fuck's sake, do you not see the significance of those foods? Jesus was the messiah of the prophecy that was made by Jews for Jews. Most of all, Jesus lived like a Jew, in a Jewish community within the Roman empire, rootless parasites that hate their gracious hosts and seek to destroy them, building nothing, contributing nothing, seeking the destruction of everything. Jesus even broke his promise, he said that the rapture would occur when one of his disciples was still alive, he claimed that the Garden of Eden was real, which means somewhere on earth is a garden with fruits that make you immortal and it has a gate guarded by an angel armed with a flaming sword that moves in every direction to prevent access by mortal men. both of these turned out not to be true. Just like how the Bible lied about the Earth being a flat plane covered by a solid "firmament" that separates us from the waters of the cosmos, with windows in it through which God allows these waters to pass when it rains, basically making our word a giant snow globe drifting in water. *Note: I'm putting cuckservatives and lolbergs on the left with the liberals, socialists, and communists, and only talking about the "White Right" here as the only groups worthy of the "Right-Wing" title.

parent
link

(post is archived)