You're argument would imply that the nature of reality is dictated by the assigned definition of sounds uttered by people.
Not really. My argument says humans use shared logic and definitions to delineate their reality. A meadow, a forest, an ocean, a lake. Yes there are gray areas in those concepts but when it comes to absolute terms as is found in set theory, there are no gray areas.
The UNIVERSE is everything there is. It has nothing to do with sounds made by humans. It exists as an idea apriori to human consciousness and language.
> You're argument would imply that the nature of reality is dictated by the assigned definition of sounds uttered by people.
Not really. My argument says humans use shared logic and definitions to delineate their reality. A meadow, a forest, an ocean, a lake. Yes there are gray areas in those concepts but when it comes to absolute terms as is found in set theory, there are no gray areas.
The UNIVERSE is everything there is. It has nothing to do with sounds made by humans. It exists as an idea apriori to human consciousness and language.
I misread your post and edited mine as above.
I misread your post and edited mine as above.
Agree. Different ways of describing the same thing.
Agree. Different ways of describing the same thing.
Good intellictual discussion. Thanks for that. Have a nice weekend.
Good intellictual discussion. Thanks for that. Have a nice weekend.
(post is archived)