I've had that conversation about lynchings as well. We see tons of corrupt courts allowing blacks to walk free even after murdering someone (islandpacket.com). Are we supposed to believe that corruption happened more or less in an era when there was no internet? Obviously, it was happening more. Are we supposed to believe blacks who commit way more crime than anyone else were committing more or less crime in an era where security cameras and forensics didn't exist? Obviously, they were committing more if they could get away with more of it.
I've had that conversation about lynchings as well. We see tons of corrupt courts allowing blacks to walk free [even after murdering someone](https://www.islandpacket.com/news/local/crime/article251701818.html). Are we supposed to believe that corruption happened more or less in an era when there was no internet? Obviously, it was happening more. Are we supposed to believe blacks who commit way more crime than anyone else were committing more or less crime in an era where security cameras and forensics didn't exist? Obviously, they were committing more if they could get away with more of it.
1/3 of lynching victims were white.
Which is about the right crime rate ratio
1/3 of lynching victims were white.
Which is about the right crime rate ratio
(post is archived)