Them (((protocols))) ain’t no joke.
Talking about the protocols, the whole plan starts with the premise that "smart"/intellect, is the supreme asset; those without it will inevitably lose and those with it will necessarily prevail and rule
And maybe that's THE Flaw in the entire plan
Think about it
Take, operation Barbarossa for instance; german tanks were light years ahead of soviet tanks technologically speaking, and german battle tank planners were anything but the worst of them all
And yet, the USSR with its cheap shitty tank spam and rather brutal approach, prevailed
....
Plenty examples where better tech and masterful planning have failed miserably. Afghanistan and Iraq being recent examples. Can’t compare that to the long, long term planners who insidiously weave their way into societies bringing about death by a thousand cuts.
Afghanistan and iraq started to turn into abject failures the moment the US decided to turn those countries into democracies
It's that moment when the US planners lose their fucking minds; when thy start getting involved into nation building and democracy and shit, it always results into a disaster
As long as the plan is limited to punctual military interventions, it's fine, that the US can do, but the moment it goes nation building you know it's going to be absolute shit of biblical proportions
It's when it goes into the nation building
Dumb take. They were also being lend-leased by the tens of thousands, life saved by a virtual continuous stream of assets, equipment and supplies.
Doesn't change the outcome
If you have vast quantities of lame VS fairly small amount of excellent, chances are on your side, that's the moral of the story
And quite frankly the "yes but we could have won if others didn't sabotage our project, it's unfair" is what every single commie says when you tell them communism failed everywhere
It's lame, it's weak
Everybody gets sabotaged, everybody tries to fuck everybody anyway they can, and the best prevail that's all
(post is archived)