under the foreskin and absorbed,
Are you advocating for circumcision?
> under the foreskin and absorbed,
Are you advocating for circumcision?
Fellow Paolr, I was simply pointing out you’re obvious conclusion of why foreskin is bad. No need to lash out! It was a brilliant conclusion, and one I’m so glad you were able to notice! I completely agree with you; we should push this to all new baby goyim, I mean boys.
Edit: holy fuck, I just noticed your name. Too fucking perfect…
Fellow Paolr, I was simply pointing out you’re obvious conclusion of why foreskin is bad. No need to lash out! It was a brilliant conclusion, and one I’m so glad you were able to notice! I completely agree with you; we should push this to all new baby goyim, I mean boys.
Edit: holy fuck, I just noticed your name. Too fucking perfect…
I didn't say foreskins were bad. If you fuck a witch, then yeah, you're going to have a bad time. But if you make love to your wife, the hormones-through-foreskin absorption enhances the bonding.
I didn't say foreskins were bad. If you fuck a witch, then yeah, you're going to have a bad time. But if you make love to your wife, the hormones-through-foreskin absorption enhances the bonding.
(post is archived)