As with most blanket statements, this one is incorrect.
It is not. The benefits never outweigh the benefits, long term. There is no safe "smoke inhalation" use. Smoke itself, from any bio-source, is carcinogenic. It's especially more harmful for children.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935114003788
The problem isn't tobacco
The problem is burning any biomass, of any kind, and inhaling it.
>As with most blanket statements, this one is incorrect.
It is not. The benefits never outweigh the benefits, long term. There is no safe "smoke inhalation" use. Smoke itself, from any bio-source, is carcinogenic. It's especially more harmful for children.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935114003788
>The problem isn't tobacco
The problem is burning any biomass, of any kind, and inhaling it.
(post is archived)