WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

720

(post is archived)

[–] 10 pts

All you other anons here missed the big part.

In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.

They just admitted the old test couldn't tell the difference between covid and flu.

[–] 4 pts

That's old news. Just nobody seems to care. Lol... Fucking absolute 🤡 world.

[–] 2 pts

they knew it never did... you just finally caught on to the phony casedemic, so they phase it out and scene change. We are onto the unvaxxinatedemic now, no go-backsies. Now you need to get the jab that you don't need that won't help you stop what doesn't exist, that they'll admit after they've made you/starved you to death unnecessarily.

[–] 2 pts

Can I opt for a quick death over a blood clot overdose?

[–] 2 pts

>a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.

https://www.pasteur.fr/en/home/press-area/press-documents/operation-and-reliability-rt-pcr-tests-detection-sars-cov-2

PRESS INFO 2020.11.16

>Reliability of the RT-PCR test To guarantee the performance of the test under development, scientists employed a system able to detect whether the three sequences used to recognize SARS-CoV-2 were present in other living organisms. With regard to the RT-PCR tests developed by the National Reference Center, the three sequences are not present simultaneously in any other organisms apart from SARS-CoV-2. The test is then validated on primary samples (confirmed as positive and negative) to verify its specificity and sensitivity (no false positives or false negatives). Negative controls (here for example nose or throat samples taken before 2019) can help assess the risk of non-specific amplification. Finally, it is advisable to use two different tests (the two tests developed by the CNR at the Institut Pasteur are named IP2 and IP4) on the same sample to guarantee the reliability of the result. This means that six sequences of the viral genome, rather than three, need to be recognized and amplified, thereby increasing the reliability of RT-PCR testing.

[–] 0 pt

Give some context you retard, those paragraphs contradict themself

[–] 2 pts (edited )

You got nigger badged

For a reason

You've failed at pattern recognition