This sounds good, but ultimately permits are an infringement. Maybe this is a good way of getting moderates on board. All states need to recognize the right to constitutional carry.
We always seem to all or nothing, I'll take my reciprocity first, then work on no permit needed.
The founding fathers were decidedly all or nothing. Maybe a lack of that attitude is the problem. "Give me liberty or give me death."
I can see your point. It's easier to take an inch than a mile. However, to advocate for permit reciprocity means that you must, in some capacity, concede that permits are appropriate.
One could argue that such concessions further ingrain permit legislation and effectively creates another barrier for constitutional carry.
No , I accept the reality based fact that when I go a half mile one way I am a potential felon , where I am legal going any of the other directions for hours upon hours.
Fighting for all or nothing is nice when you expect nothing. I can't even get an inch, so I'll take the inch if its given, becuase it is at least an inch more than I had.
I can even argue the ones saying all or nothing, truly do not support it and actually want nothing, or they would be willing to accept whatever inroads can be made. How do you think the jews eroded our rights in the first place? We can't reasonably expect to put them back all at once. Anyone who thinks so is a fool in my opinion, based upon eons of history.
This is what I came here to day.