![How is this not an act of treason by an antigun obama judge? [1046x1548 - 233KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/Bu8B9c.jpg){kind=link}
Inalienable rights granted by our creator would apply to any and all people, the bill of rights is just a legal recognition of these inalienable rights.
It makes perfect sense that aliens and criminals would share these rights but all the more reason for us to be an ethnostate for europeans which is precisely what our immigration standard was.
Ergo , in my world an illegal alien - while having those inalienable rights to 'possess' a gun - can also be prosecuted for 'carrying' that firearm on (public ) US territory as a 'Non-US citizen' or foreign-flagged armed combatant /
If we declared an invasion I would say it is no contest that potential enemy combatants should be disarmed.
Or more specifically to be considered a peaceful entrant any migrants would need to surrender their arms as a sign of peaceful intent and those arms would be returned on exit or after a sufficient time without commiting a crime.
But I find it all a hassle, I say we finish trumps "wall" put some razor wire on it and put some auto guns designed to fire on anyone who reaches the top of the wall shooting down the length of the wall. And declare an invasion, genocide have been committed against us and as a result checkpoints designed to check paper work and ID would be mandated and an inquisition to exterminate traitors and become oversight in government would be created.
Agreed, and along with a functioning secure wall, an actual photo-ID verified non-electronic (internet/ wifi accessible) voting system where-in any vote not 'lawfully' cast on the day of voting is null and void and unlawful voter malcontents shot.
In b4 - 'Whoah woah easy on there fella, enough of the alt-right unfounded deboonked conspiracy's and anti-semitisms'.
(post is archived)