Came to say the same thing in fact there are several I have heard several scholars who say that the pernunciation of the word “inalienable” is often wrong. it's not supposed to be in-alien-able, as in you cannot be alienated from it. Rather it is in-a-LIEN-able, as in the government does not even have the right to place any kind of lien against your rights.
Came to say the same thing in fact there are several I have heard several scholars who say that the pernunciation of the word “inalienable” is often wrong. it's not supposed to be in-alien-able, as in you cannot be alienated from it. Rather it is in-a-LIEN-able, as in the government does not even have the right to place any kind of lien against your rights.
Not sure I understand that interpretation. A lien could be applied only to something which could be conveyed. Intrinsic rights can't be conveyed.
Not sure I understand that interpretation. A lien could be applied only to something which could be conveyed. Intrinsic rights can't be conveyed.
(post is archived)