WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

So, let's have a car maker be responsible for car accidents

or any other industry that produces "goods" responsible for the item misuse

Guns, nowdays, are NOT supposed to be used to kill random people, they are for DEFENSE

Clearly ther eis an agenda going on

[–] 3 pts

How about drug manufactures being responsible for side effects? Not even the misuse, but the correct use even harms so many people in the country.

[–] 1 pt

So..when politicians do things that kill grandma..or go against sexual harassment laws, they should be punished?

[–] 0 pt

why not try enforcing laws that already exist instead of just creating new ones that are selectively inforced

[–] 1 pt

why not try enforcing laws that already exist instead of just creating new ones that are selectively inforced

That's a rhetorical question, right?

[–] 0 pt

The manufacturers would just cut off NY

[–] 0 pt

GOOD BY NYC

[–] 1 pt

GOOD BY NYC

I am so happy I left when I did.

[–] 0 pt

I WUZ BANNED BECUZ I FLASHED CHUCKY SHUEMAR FO SHOWING MAH DICK

[–] 0 pt

Let's just get down to it. This is legislation trying to hold white people financially responsible for niggers stealing their guns.

It would bury them in lawsuits and insurance costs. Could they just stop selling them to NY?

[–] 0 pt

That's what they want. They want niggers to be armed and white people to be unable to defend themselves. Incrementalism at work. You can't give an inch or you lose the war.

[–] 0 pt

This is legislation trying to hold white people financially responsible for niggers stealing their guns committing all sorts of crimes.