Chicago+gun control=762 murders every year. The last failure this Stupid was Prohibition.
Chicago+gun control=762 murders every year. The last failure this Stupid was Prohibition.
LOOK AT NIGGERS! Niggers and non-whites commit the most violent gun crime. Ban niggers, not guns.
LOOK AT NIGGERS!
Niggers and non-whites commit the most violent gun crime.
Ban niggers, not guns.
Why is the point of this article to jerk off the fucking useful idiot Pincus?
Fuck him and anyone interested in entertaining more "compromise".
It's about time the grabbers start to compromise, by moving to Canada or some other shit hole that is already doing the bullshit they want.
Why is the point of this article to jerk off the fucking useful idiot Pincus?
Fuck him and anyone interested in entertaining more "compromise".
It's about time the grabbers start to compromise, by moving to Canada or some other shit hole that is already doing the bullshit they want.
Why is the point of this article to jerk off the fucking useful idiot Pincus?
I'm not sure it is.
Now, I know that, to many of you, Pincus is persona non grata after he penned a recent op-ed. I’ve addressed those arguments and I’m not going to rehash them. I will say that he’s right. Magazine restrictions don’t do jack about suicides, which account for the lion’s share of the total number of “gun deaths” in this country, about two-thirds to be exact.
If you’re going to claim to care about suicides, magazine restrictions aren’t likely to work.
There are a lot of issues here, and while it may look like Pincus is outright siding with anti-gunners, I think he’s included to be more of a counter-balance. He’s also likely included because he’s a name that has been linked with being willing to negotiate on guns, even if that doesn’t accurately portray his position.
The question is, will this be a new approach for gun controllers?
>
Why is the point of this article to jerk off the fucking useful idiot Pincus?
I'm not sure it is.
>
Now, I know that, to many of you, Pincus is persona non grata after he penned a recent op-ed. I’ve addressed those arguments and I’m not going to rehash them. I will say that he’s right. Magazine restrictions don’t do jack about suicides, which account for the lion’s share of the total number of “gun deaths” in this country, about two-thirds to be exact.
>
If you’re going to claim to care about suicides, magazine restrictions aren’t likely to work.
>
There are a lot of issues here, and while it may look like Pincus is outright siding with anti-gunners, I think he’s included to be more of a counter-balance. He’s also likely included because he’s a name that has been linked with being willing to negotiate on guns, even if that doesn’t accurately portray his position.
>
*The question is, will this be a new approach for gun controllers?*
(post is archived)