If someone would have to take money from a medical or housing use to pay for this tax, that should be considered a violation of the right to bear arms. It may take a decade, but this should make it to SCOTUS.
If someone would have to take money from a medical or housing use to pay for this tax, that should be considered a violation of the right to bear arms. It may take a decade, but this should make it to SCOTUS.
(post is archived)