The model assumed a specificity of 100% for the RT-PCR
So, they're "assuming" a false positive rate of 0%. What a streaming pile of shit.
1 our of 5 test negative (at "best")? Perhaps that's because they don't have it, they just have a fucking cold.
> The model assumed a specificity of 100% for the RT-PCR
So, they're "assuming" a false positive rate of 0%. What a streaming pile of shit.
1 our of 5 test negative (at "best")? Perhaps that's because they don't have it, they just have a fucking cold.
(post is archived)