This is exactly what I want to hear, especially because it may provide insight into what really happened. For example, listen closely to the video around @4:30. @Dreamcatcher "predicted" HRC would be arrested on a given date, but instead Trump's guys were arrested on the same date. I'd never even heard of this, and it's so dumb it's either laughable or sickening. An impending HRC arrest is obviously clickbate on any alt-right forum, but how then does the exact same date turn out to be when Trump's guys were arrested? Unless the predicted date & subsequent arrests was just a coincidence, then either @Dreamcatcher was an insider who already knew when Trump's guys would be arrested and was using the post to gaslight and demoralize Trump supporters, or else @Dreamcatcher was unwittingly fed disinfo by a 3rd party insider, with the correct date but wrong target of the arrest, also for the purpose of gaslighting, or @Dreamcatcher was just clickbaiting all along and DOJ found out about Q and then used the same date for their own gaslighting purposes. I can't see other alternatives, and the date being sheer coincidence doesn't seem very plausible. In hindsight, the Q phenomenon has managed to entirely discredit the alt-right, including every last true fact mentioned along with the Q posts. In the minds of videots who watch TV &/or stare at their cell phones all day, anyone supporting an audit of the Fed is a "Q anon conspiracy theorist", anyone favoring money backed by a commodity like Gold or Silver is a "Q anon conspiracy theorist", anyone mentioning Podesta's emails or Pizzagate is a "Q anon conspiracy theorist", and the list goes on and on. By now, anyone who doesn't regurgitate the canned media narrative is an an "alt right racist homophobe Q-anon conspiracy theorist Trump supporter". I've wondered if Q wasn't John Podesta himself in his underwear typing coded messages in between molesting & murdering boys. In the minds of the average videot consumer, nothing could have obscured and discredited the topic of Podesta's emails, the alt-right community, or non-mainstream forums than Q has. The Trump/Q/alt-right contingent seems to falsely believe that having "facts" or the "majority" or the "internet" on their side is relevant to the oncoming NWO tyranny, and they just aren't. If any of these were relevant, tyranny would have never existed in the first place. It doesn't take more than about 10% of folks implementing the NWO agenda to force compliance by the other 90%, and we're closer to 90% compliance than 10.