Still skeptical.

I tend to look at things from the effect perspective to derive or infer motive. Given that MSM and many others are bashing Q means that it is somehow a threat or it was a trap. But if it were an entrapment scheme, then why "Trust the plan" to do nothing? The Trump opposition has been doing everything they can to provoke a violent response from Trump supporters. "Trusting the plan" would be just the opposite.

My best take is that the Q thing was part of some attempt to keep the American population from going ape shit over some military operation planned for decades. Another clue that there was a multi-decade plan is that the internet started as a DOD (military) project. Had it not been for the internet, there would have been no serious challenge to the MSM narratives. Now the internet is tearing up the MSM narratives.

So, my best guess is still that Q is the real deal, and all this anti-Q stuff indicates that it's a threat to very powerful and corrupt people. No other reasoning seems to fit.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I find this piece laughable. Those guys were not part of Q at all. They are full of it. Other than the obvious 1st prediction of Hillary being arrested Q has made no set dates as to when things happen. Anons however have date fagged. I'll debunk this piece because anyone that has followed Q from the beginning know all about anons verifying if Q was real or a larp. Its called Q proofs. And anyone that has followed Q from the beginning know that Q worked very closely with President Trump. Again that can and often was verified with Q syncing his Drop with President Trump Tweets most times down to the nano the second. Plus other Q verifying was done by asking Q to tell President Trump to put a certain word, phrase or misspelling in his Tweet. And President Trump did just that. Let's say this so called founder is telling the truth. That might explain the one and only date prediction by Q. Then Trump and team saw an opportunity and took it over. The deep state love to discredit what they can not control. Q pages were the 1st to get purged on FB. Why do that if its all a LARP. The guys said its dangerous. Dangerous for the deep state maybe

This is exactly what I want to hear, especially because it may provide insight into what really happened.

For example, listen closely to the video around :30. "predicted" HRC would be arrested on a given date, but instead Trump's guys were arrested on the same date. I'd never even heard of this, and it's so dumb it's either laughable or sickening.

An impending HRC arrest is obviously clickbate on any alt-right forum, but how then does the exact same date turn out to be when Trump's guys were arrested?

Unless the predicted date & subsequent arrests was just a coincidence, then either was an insider who already knew when Trump's guys would be arrested and was using the post to gaslight and demoralize Trump supporters, or else was unwittingly fed disinfo by a 3rd party insider, with the correct date but wrong target of the arrest, also for the purpose of gaslighting, or was just clickbaiting all along and DOJ found out about Q and then used the same date for their own gaslighting purposes.

I can't see other alternatives, and the date being sheer coincidence doesn't seem very plausible.

In hindsight, the Q phenomenon has managed to entirely discredit the alt-right, including every last true fact mentioned along with the Q posts. In the minds of videots who watch TV &/or stare at their cell phones all day, anyone supporting an audit of the Fed is a "Q anon conspiracy theorist", anyone favoring money backed by a commodity like Gold or Silver is a "Q anon conspiracy theorist", anyone mentioning Podesta's emails or Pizzagate is a "Q anon conspiracy theorist", and the list goes on and on. By now, anyone who doesn't regurgitate the canned media narrative is an an "alt right racist homophobe Q-anon conspiracy theorist Trump supporter".

I've wondered if Q wasn't John Podesta himself in his underwear typing coded messages in between molesting & murdering boys. In the minds of the average videot consumer, nothing could have obscured and discredited the topic of Podesta's emails, the alt-right community, or non-mainstream forums than Q has.

The Trump/Q/alt-right contingent seems to falsely believe that having "facts" or the "majority" or the "internet" on their side is relevant to the oncoming NWO tyranny, and they just aren't. If any of these were relevant, tyranny would have never existed in the first place. It doesn't take more than about 10% of folks implementing the NWO agenda to force compliance by the other 90%, and we're closer to 90% compliance than 10.

OANN is run by a bunch of kikes, too? WTF...