WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

A bumpstock, does not a gun make. It's only functionality is to make a firearm more dangerous by making it unmanageable. Listen, I cant even buy a suppressor in my state because they're illegal here. But I can carry my gun just about anywhere without raising many eyebrows. My state is very "progun", but we also value common sense, and as long as we do that the federal government will not be able to remove our inaliable rights.

[–] 2 pts

very common sense

Take your cuckoldry elsewhere.

The government has no right to infringe on any weapon at all, in part or in whole.

[–] 0 pt

I feel you, I get it. What the law says and what the government interprets it to say is 2 different things. Personally I would like to sport a fully armed F-15 for my daily commute, but "govey" just won't let me. The law says I should have every right to. But seriously with the bump stocks can no one out here agree that were a bad (unsafe) idea to begin with? Just move to a good state spend $200 and purchase a full auto trigger set with a new BCG and have a automatic blast.

[–] 1 pt

It doesn't matter if bumpstocks are unsafe. It truly does not matter. Stop arguing on jew terms. Just stop. You're living your life in a way that you must to stay whole due to the ZOG and I won't argue against that.

Also the claim about muh accuracy is retarded. Just as machine guns aren't designed to be target accurate, neither are bumpstocks. Yes bumpstocks are worse, but again: irrelevant to EVERYTHING.