WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

701

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

A (((lawyer))) advocated for this injunction. That person has an address and a sleep schedule.

[–] 1 pt

The problem is the judge / courts and our refusal to deal with them. If the judicial branch doesn't like a law all they can do is wait for someone to be arrested and set them free. That's how checks and balances work. (or are supposed to)

e.g. - Legislature makes a bad law - The Executive branch must uphold said law - The courts turn all people affected by this free because, bad law - The people get sick of the stupid and money wasting then replace the legislature

[–] 0 pt

The Judge looks like a pedophile.