![Nooooo you can’t do to us what we do to you!! [611x829 - 73KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/XvhTiJ.png){kind=link}
That thing can't even read. 2a and 2b say that the proof of an allegation must be more than simply "he's Christian" or "he cited science". Also, 2 clearly says that this only applies to race, sex/orientation/gender. So how could a far-right extremist claim his religion was discriminated against?
That thing can't even read. 2a and 2b say that the proof of an allegation must be more than simply "he's Christian" or "he cited science". Also, 2 clearly says that this only applies to race, sex/orientation/gender. So how could a far-right extremist claim his religion was discriminated against?
The cited science part of the law is regarding sex vs gender. You can't claim (if this passes) that someone discriminated against you because they say that someone with XY chromosomes is male, or someone with XX chromosomes is female.
The cited science part of the law is regarding sex vs gender. You can't claim (if this passes) that someone discriminated against you because they say that someone with XY chromosomes is male, or someone with XX chromosomes is female.
Or, "it has been scientifically determined that you are a niggerfaggot."
Or, "it has been scientifically determined that you are a *niggerfaggot*."
(post is archived)