WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

That fold on the left arm on the last panel looks kinda sussy.

Lefties worship ancient skeletor bitch

Cryptkeeper dies

THERE ARE TOO MANY OLD PEOPLE ON THE SUPREME COURT! THEY ARE OUT OF TOUCH!!

[–] 0 pt

I know. I've heard them crying about old people when they worshipped that old nag for years. Now that their walking corpse is gone all of a sudden they say the SJC needs young blood.

Nevermind that Amy Coney Barrett and Kavanaugh are pretty damn young.

[–] 0 pt

No no no the first 3 panels of it are fine. The issue is the last panel only. It's wrong. From his writings Thomas is fully well in agreement with infringement on guns. He doesn't say or use "Shall Not Be Infringed" in his ruling to lay the law down. He uses SCOTUS' first gun ruling (((Miller))) '39 to do so. And that wasn't actually a case. Miller died before SCOTUS heard the case. Miller's estate then didn't pay for a lawyer to send to SC to argue. It was a 1 sided noncase and should be struck from all legal authority.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Except he's not. He uses lies of old jewish subversion to restrain guns. I doubt very many of you read his opinion. It's not very optimistic for gun owners. He prattles on and on multiple times about what is commonly owned being acceptable as a gun. Which is itself an infringement. Which itself is a method of infringement. All that needs to be done is limit access to certain guns in a manner that isn't unconstitutional. Then those guns / weapons become not in common use then the law banning them becomes constitutional to this nigger. The history of the US is one of ZERO restriction. He upholds (((restrictions))) with his own written word. His opinion carries forward (((US v Miller 1939))) which banned full auto and further the (((NFA))) and (((GCA))).

Thomas is NOT pro gun. Not REMOTELY. He's controlled to sate the anger. Miles have been taken, miles upon miles. We've been given an inch.