WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

238

Funny.

Funny.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I provided an explanation that the entire ecosystem below the os is a set of virtualized, paravirtualized and customized operating systems that are NOT under the control of the operating system or the user but the vendor of the hardware or any other third parties that have access to those layers. This is an ABSOLUTE fact.

Feel free to disprove that if you like.

You know what else is also a fact? Anything NOT under your control is / can be UNDER SOMEONE ELSES CONTROL. So, for example, whomever controls the TPM chip controls the credentials to your wholy encrypted disk. Whomever controls the firmware on your hard drive controls access to the data on your hard drive.

You live under the illusion that you, the guest of an operating system has any control over anything. You don't. You and your silly os are mere guests in someone elses playground.

[–] 0 pt

I provided an explanation that the entire ecosystem below the os is a set of virtualized, paravirtualized and customized operating systems that are NOT under the control of the operating system or the user but the vendor of the hardware or any other third parties that have access to those layers. This is an ABSOLUTE fact.

Which does not refute anything I said at all. It's not even relevant and you don't understand why, either.

If you had any point, then it would been shown in the dozens of audits these systems have had since that was discovered. It hasn't. It wasn't. Guess why? Black chain and encryption the entire way. Even if a malicious payload wanted to modify votes, it can't. It would first need to crack the encryption as well as the block chain. Impossible without trillions of years.

The best a lite-OS like this could do is a DoS attack but even then, it's still impossible because it would not be part of the signed blockchain.

You live under the illusion that you

No, that's you. Hundreds of millions of votes cast using secure electronic voting and STILL not a single instance of fraud in these systems. The fraud is still at the registration process.

Guess what it also does? Increases voter participation while reducing duplicate votes.

[–] 0 pt

You are the one making the claim, the onus is on you to prove YOUR claim.

I don't have to do anything beyond dismiss your ludicrous claims. I mean, you are the one that just posted this drivel:

>Hundreds of millions of votes cast using secure electronic voting and STILL not a single instance of fraud in these systems. The fraud is still at the registration process.

At this point, we can just let everyone here judge your claims for what they are.

[–] 0 pt

You are the one making the claim, the onus is on you to prove YOUR claim.

I did. You refuse to read. Because you're old, ignorant, and a bit stupid.

At this point, we can just let everyone here judge your claims for what they are.

Yeah, "everyone" as if anyone on this site actually gives a shit about our conversation.

And, yeah, we can: numerous audits and pen tests prove how much of a moron you are.