![Miss-spelled 'faggots' [750x1280 - 704KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/aBMQtr.png){kind=link}
>Let he who is sinless cast the first stone.
How can any law or moral code be enforced if only the sinless can enforce them? Thieves, murders, blackmailers, perverts would be running amok if only the sinless can stop them. Civilization couldn't exist if that Bible passage was followed literally.
John 8 was talking about the fucking Jews trying to trap Jesus. Jesus turned the tables and asked who among the Jews were without sin. They were "found out" and scurried home like rats.
> If you want to be a Muslim stuck in the Middle Ages where it is a crime for same-sex relationships
For almost 2000 years homosexaulism was dealt with the same way in the entire Christian world: death. Homosexualism was a felony crime in every state in the USA until the fucking Jews started overturning those laws in the 1960's. The USA has become a degenerate, perverted Hellpit since then where now the homosexualists are openly grooming kids in the public elementary schools.
>Here's the line: informed consent
That makes things WORSE. Any adult man that consents to another a man's penis being violently rammed into his anus and then ejaculating into his feces is a deranged individual. That is one of the least sickening thing homosexualist do to each other behind closed doors. Homosexualists are a danger to themselves and society. They deserve the roof.
Fuck your so-called freedom.
"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other" - John Adams
The Founders understood that ill mannered, immoral and irreligious men, i.e. men that fuck other men, would destroy a free society. More often than not they were not dealt with by the Law but by the duel and the lynch mob. Freedom? Back then men had to behave properly or they would be fucking kllled. This how society and civilization protected itself and progressed.
How can any law or moral code be enforced if only the sinless can enforce them?
You proposed it, not me. I'm okay with it because one person's sin is another person's perfectly okay activity. Since it involves consenting adults, I have no right, nor do you, to cast any stones. My line is "not consenting adults." Pretty simple, the law should stop in to protect those who cannot consent.
John 8 was talking about the fucking Jews trying to trap Jesus.
John 8 was paramount to establishing the gospel of Christ where love replaced the strict Law of Moses. It's among the most important chapters in Christianity to drive the point of the change in the use of the gospel. The pharisees thought to trap Jesus with the Law of Moses and show Christ's message to be hypocritical - He preached the message of peace, love, forgiveness. So the entrapment is, "Law of Moses says to stone her. Time to stone her, eh Jeshua, ol' boy? But you love your message about peace, love, and forgiveness. You're in a paradox. You don't stone her, you defy the Law of Moses. You do stone her, you are a hypocrite going against your message."
Funnily enough, you seemed to have missed the entire point of the Gospel of Christ about love, forgiveness, and peace. It is none of your business what two consenting adults to in the privacy of their own home. Keyword is "consent." If you want to claim to follow the teaching's of Christ, your position is one of forgiveness, love, understanding. Your job is also to protect the innocent - those who cannot consent.
The law should clearly codify protections against those that cannot consent. Your attempt to slippery slope this is dishonest. The line is clear. The line is based on the best available science we have on human psychology and consent. In a court of law, we can prove with expert witnesses if a person was incapable of consent. "Abuse of the disabled."
Fuck your so-called freedom.
Fuck your so called Satanic Control Freak bullshit. Stop thinking about dudes having sex so much and trying to control what they do. You're skirting a thin line between being a pedo-apologist by using their same arguments. Consent is paramount.
>I'm okay with it because one person's sin is another person's perfectly okay activity.
Sin is defined by God, motherfucker. It's not a personal opinion. Faggotry is an abomination, a mortal sin worthy of death. And its pretty obvious you either suck dick, smoke dope, or fuck kids and you've latched on to John 8:7 to assuage your guilty conscious.
>Satanic Control Freak bullshit
Satan's motto is Do what thou wilt, you cocksucker, which the opposite of control. That is what you are advocating. You eat Satan's ass.
Again I ask. What is to stop liars, thieves, murders, blackmailers, perverts from running amok if only the sinless can "cast the first stone?" I will keep asking the same question until you give me a straight answer, you child molesting faggot.
You're right, let's round up all the gays and stone them. Let's also stone the adulterers. Let's also stone people who work on the holy day.
Allahu Akbar!
What is to stop liars, thieves, murders, blackmailers, perverts from running amok if only the sinless can "cast the first stone?"
Strawman. Answered already.
(post is archived)