WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[+] [deleted] 8 pts
[–] 3 pts

Maggots are probably cleaner, biologically.

[–] 3 pts

So Eric W Dolan thinks this is a "surprising finding"? Says a lot about Eric.

Oddly enough he said the same thing when he went looking for his dick.

[–] 2 pts

Have to agree with the headline, holds true for me anyway

[–] 2 pts

This would be objective data.

You can't argue with objective data.

And I also find it disgusting.

Man...I am 100% okay if two consenting adults want to have sex in the privacy of their homes. I don't care at all.

Just like a straight couple slobbering all over each other, I don't want to see gay couples doing that shit in public, either. Have some class. Keep that shit private. Hugs. Holding hands. Arms around each other. That's fine. But getting overtly sexual about it in public is not.

I'm clearly not a prude but I still think there's a line.

Seeing a straight couple make-out is 50% gay, by the way. Food for thought.

[–] 0 pt

"I am 100% okay if two consenting adults want to have sex in the privacy of their homes. I don't care at all."

This is exactly the attitude that has gotten us into this mess. You think those faggots leave their sick perversions in the bedroom? No! As soon as they leave the bedroom they start grooming children and subverting society.

Faggots are a danger to society and should be thrown off of roof tops. Enablers like you are WORSE than dick sucking faggots.

[–] 0 pt

On the other hand... maybe... maybe, people like you get us all in these situation. This sick behavior is old as humanity, you can agree or disagree, but this is fact. And these mentally ill use extreme opponents to smuggle his agenda. Good job, genius, they outsmart you.

[–] 0 pt

This is exactly the attitude that has gotten us into this mess.

Let he who is sinless cast the first stone.

It's not a slippery slope if you have clearly defined lines and you don't cross them.

That's the problem - people have no backbone.

If you want to be a Muslim stuck in the Middle Ages where it is a crime for same-sex relationships, that's not okay in civilized society nor is it okay in a Christian-dominate nation.

Here's the line: informed consent.

A child cannot give INFORMED consent. Some adults cannot. It should be a crime to take advantage of adults who cannot (and it is - but only for the disabled but there are personality types that cannot give informed consent even though they have normal intelligence and I think these types should be considered as being taken advantage of just like kids or disabled).

It's not difficult at all to draw the line at informed consent and keep it there. People who cannot do that are usually pedos or Muslims stuck in the 1400s.

[–] 0 pt

>Let he who is sinless cast the first stone.

How can any law or moral code be enforced if only the sinless can enforce them? Thieves, murders, blackmailers, perverts would be running amok if only the sinless can stop them. Civilization couldn't exist if that Bible passage was followed literally.

John 8 was talking about the fucking Jews trying to trap Jesus. Jesus turned the tables and asked who among the Jews were without sin. They were "found out" and scurried home like rats.

> If you want to be a Muslim stuck in the Middle Ages where it is a crime for same-sex relationships

For almost 2000 years homosexaulism was dealt with the same way in the entire Christian world: death. Homosexualism was a felony crime in every state in the USA until the fucking Jews started overturning those laws in the 1960's. The USA has become a degenerate, perverted Hellpit since then where now the homosexualists are openly grooming kids in the public elementary schools.

>Here's the line: informed consent

That makes things WORSE. Any adult man that consents to another a man's penis being violently rammed into his anus and then ejaculating into his feces is a deranged individual. That is one of the least sickening thing homosexualist do to each other behind closed doors. Homosexualists are a danger to themselves and society. They deserve the roof.

Fuck your so-called freedom.

"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other" - John Adams

The Founders understood that ill mannered, immoral and irreligious men, i.e. men that fuck other men, would destroy a free society. More often than not they were not dealt with by the Law but by the duel and the lynch mob. Freedom? Back then men had to behave properly or they would be fucking kllled. This how society and civilization protected itself and progressed.

[–] 2 pts

It's an evolutionary response as rotting flesh, maggots and spoilt food are a clear sign of disease. Same as faggots.

[–] 1 pt

This only proves what I said all along.. there's no such thing as "homophobia" because "phobia" implies fear. I'm not afraid of faggots, I simply think they're gross. It's not complicated.

[–] 1 pt

"homonausea" - sick to death of faggotry

[–] 1 pt

It give you shivers,cringe worthy and causes you to turn away

It is the natural reaction to any thing abhorrent

[–] 1 pt

It's not misspelled, OP; that'd just make it redundant.

I’m less repulsed by maggots. Maggots are nature’s garbage disposal. Faggots are just garbage.

[–] 1 pt

Good. Faggots are gross. It's now settled science.

Load more (5 replies)