WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

You don't seem to get the idea of "Broader Context". Raytheon's entire existence is for nothing more than death and destruction for profit. There is nothing eco-friendly about explosive tipped missiles.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

There is nothing eco-friendly about explosive tipped missiles.

WRONG!

By removing brown people, the most environmentally destructive of all the people, you remove a useless eater and consoomer from the ecosystem. Nits grow into lice, and lice reproduce quickly.

[–] 3 pts

You didn't even try and stay on topic for a reply. Jumped right into the racial non-sequitur argument. I wasn't aware Raytheon made weapons specifically for killing brown people flying aircraft. I am also not sure how this benefits the environment as indigenous black Africans flying aircraft is as rare as unicorns.

[–] 2 pts

i would argue white are the most environementally destructive we created the technology then gave it to peoples who have zero connection to our moral compass. environmental destruction everywhere and also look at fucking light bulbs some last a fucking 100 years and now you cant get one that lasts 6 months and the chemicals in the light bulbs are a huge fucking pain in the ass to recycle

[–] 1 pt

Who the fuck is removing brown people? The only people being removed from existence is white people.

[–] 0 pt

One day the whole world will be removed and the evil humans will be punished

[–] 1 pt

The cunt is specifically talking about anti-aircraft missles though. They use those on, big surprise, aircraft. Not schools and hospitals.

[–] 4 pts

The broader context is Raytheon claiming their products are friendly to the environment. That is the laughable irony.

Don't forget

We are proud of our commitment to a better future for all the children of the world.

Hence the reference to hospitlas and schools getting blown up, since that is all thanks to raytheon's weapons and war mongering. Not exactly all the children of the world.

[–] 0 pt

So if they were a non-profit they would be alright. Got it.

[–] 0 pt

A non-profit weapons manufacturer is even more preposterous than one claiming to be eco-friendly.

[–] 0 pt

Ya, that was the point. I don't know why you have to include the "for profit" modifier on your statement.

You sound like a clueless, naive child making it sound like people who do things for money are evil. You sound like some kind of leftist commie faggot. All of you queers act like "death and destruction" is a big deal when it's someone else doing it. Meanwhile, you fucking queers live in a pristine, contained environment where you never have to worry about fighting external threats. All you do is bitch about people that actually do something because you know you're so ineffectual and lazy that the world wouldn't even realize it if you ceased to exist.