this post should be sent to the official email of the jewdio studio that made this anti White garbage of a "show".

Unironically I believe for them pogroms or large-scale persecution has, either intentionally or unintentionally, been used to externalize their critical faculties where it involved self-awareness, just as corporations and organizations run by them are really effective at externalizing costs, this could only come at the expense of the conscience, or a severe lack thereof, withoutwhich, the environment must provide all the correctives.

As a people and culture, they took the question of nature and nurture to its limit, selecting for nature and adaption to their environment, prior to changing it.

Which means when caucasians are gone or all our influence is eliminated globally, Judaism will likely find its way into a local maxima and eventually fail on a large scale.

Because the subversion of the rules, is not the same as breaking the rules. And likewise the best at subverting the rules, including natural law (like the limits to their own growth power, etc), are also the ones least capable of responding to and learning from the consequences or outcomes (see economic blackswans for details) when they push systems, both political, and natural, to their limit. Thats why we see them double down--because without imagination and creativity, the rational faculty struggles to understand why a behavior, tactic or strategy would stop working "when it always worked before!"

Their culture, I don't think, is conscious or as unified in its collective awareness of itself, as they believe. I think mostly, rather than conscious, its reactive.

If you look at all the history of the science of evolution, there is a common theme: Two types of animals. Those that adapt to their environment, or those that change their environment.

All the animals that went extinct, all the species that are endangered, or stuck in a local environment, are the ones that at some point collectively, adopted the strategy of adaption.

The fact that Judaisms presence does change its environment, has less to do with it being deliberate environmental engineering, although there is that, and more to do with with Judaism resisting adaption, to the damage of the very thing it is adapting to.

There is to say, not merely species that adapt to their environment, or adapt their environment to them, but also those that

(a) those that resist changes in their environment by self-adaption and (b) those that resist the self-adaption tendency by attempting to change their environment. In the former case (a), the damage is internalized to culture. In the latter case, the damage is externalized, leading to resistance and characterization as invaders or even parasites.

Caucasians are mostly group A, and it shows in the repeated collapse and dark ages, the peak and trough formation of our culture. While Judaism and other semitic groups are mostly group B.

Resisting our nature is what causes this, I believe, but I can't of course prove it. The semites fear losing themselves and so destroy what sustains them. While the caucasians over extend ourselves.

This arises from the problem of demographics I think. Problems arise in groups larger than 150 people. How do you get new genetic material into the group to prevent genetic disorders and recessive genes from emerging? But then theres the secondary and psychological problem this causes in groups of people: How do you manage their fear of change, of Other, of losing "themselves" not simply as individuals, but "as a people". This is not a trivial problem. It is at the very heart of all the conflicts between the semites, the eurasians, and the european west. This is a very deep seated issue thats at the center of everything, the problem of this mass psychology brewing beneath the surface.

Jewish culture solves this two fold:

1. attacking the meaning of what it is to be any other group (again, externalizing, so they dont have to change)

2. integrating their opponents, to remove their opponents identity. This is at a cultural level. I don't speak of an intentional strategy, but more of what emerges collectively as a a mode or pattern of general thinking in a particular group. Because that which doesn't have an identity, presents no apparent threat to that which is fraid of losing its own identity. How, after all, can you "lose yourself" and your cultural and genetic identity into an enemy which doesn't even have an identity of its own? You don't. You may take freely from that group, for the maintenance of your own genetics and culture, and leave what you don't. Its "free property" to them.

Europeans approached this entirely different:

1. mass aggriculture that boosted population

2. Population density and relatively low death rate lead to an excess of males, psychopathic males, and competition pressure.

3. Infighting removed the genetic defects who were more likely to be conscripted, more likely to fight, and more likely to kill or be killed.

In this regards this was a eugenic process of self-taming.

I think we achieved the ideal balance of growth, correct level of aggression, and progress, sometime between 1700-1900. And if not for world war I, and II, we might have stayed at those levels as a group, and gone on to build a much larger, much more advanced civilization (forgiving the stupid "we would be travelling the stars" memes.)

Faced with this threat, of irrelevance, Judaism and the international lobby (banks) started two wars, using England as the facility to provoke the conflicts.

Furthermore these two world wars, were not merely a battle between Judaism and Caucasians (anglo-saxons as it were), but between three sides: Judaism, Caucasians, and Caucasians against ourselves, enabling the internationalists and enriching them, which was probably the intention.

If you want to go further back, we could say its been a four way conflict, with christianity at war with its offshoot, Judaism, or vice-versa, by which the varied pagans of the caucasian/european branch were brought together through worship of pre-rationality and a "higher cause" that they recognized as common among us, even across tribal, religious, and ethnocentric lines.

Just as judaism desires to shatter and conquer america, simply because thats what it does to any nation it inhabits, it seeks to likewise colonize, and shatter christianity, with the pieces in its control. Hence protestantism. Meaning and identity is lost in a sufficiently large and uncontrolled cultural diaspora.

As a tangent, unironically I think, that 'the church' (Catholicism) will be both the cultural archetype of "antichrist" and messiah, saving the Caucasian cultural strategy (group A) while falling on its sword eventually. And that the reason for the "falling on its sword bit", as predicted in revelations, boils down simply to the fact that pathocracies, as all dialectic group processes lead to (e.x. the iron law of oligarchy), even when well intentioned, must always create their own opposition, till the cost of continuing exceeds their own ability to maintain themselves as a singular cohesive unit. Cells that have aged too much, and accumulated destructive tendencies, even in the process of adaption, eventually encounter conditions for which their collected damages and adaptions make them ill equiped to manage, and eventually die. The little death we can even see in the rise of Protestantism, speaking to the inevitable fall of the entire edifice.

And now let us end here: The only question remaining is, now that we have moved well past the discussion of Judaism, whether catholicism will manage to reign in Protestantism, and reproduce itself successfully, before passing into history?

You don't educate psychotic fucks, because it allows them to better their craft. Far better for them to be obvious rather than covert.

this post should be sent to the official email of the jewdio studio that made this anti White garbage of a "show".

Then send it to them.

I'm sure they'll find it amusing.